• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显微镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗后健康相关生活质量改善的术前 MRI 预测因素。

Preoperative MRI predictors of health-related quality of life improvement after microscopic lumbar discectomy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2020 Mar;20(3):391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.020
PMID:31580903
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is a common spinal pathology often treated by microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD), though prior reports have not demonstrated which preoperative MRI factors may contribute to significant clinical improvement after MLD.

PURPOSE

To analyze the MRI characteristics in patients with HNP that predict meaningful clinical improvement in health-related quality of life scores (HRQoL) after MLD.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective clinical and radiological study of patients undergoing MLD for HNP at a single institution over a 2-year period.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty-eight patients receiving MLD treatment for HNP.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cephalocaudal Canal Migration; Canal & HNP Anterior-Posterior (AP) Lengths and Ratio; Canal & HNP Axial Areas and Ratio; Hemi-Canal & Hemi-HNP Axial Areas and Ratio; Disc appearance (black, gray, or mixed); Baseline (BL); and 3-month (3M) postoperative HRQoL scores.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old who received MLD for HNP with BL and 3M HRQoL scores of PROMIS (Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity), ODI, VAS Back, and VAS Leg scores were included. HNP and spinal canal measurements of cephalocaudal migration, AP length, area, hemi-area, and disc appearance were performed using T2 axial and sagittal MRI. HNP measurements were divided by corresponding canal measurements to calculate AP, Area, and Hemi-Area ratios. Using known minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for each ΔHRQoL score, patients were separated into two groups based on whether they reached MCID (MCID+) or did not reach MCID (MCID-). The MCID for PROMIS pain intensity was calculated using a decision tree. A linear regression illustrated correlations between PROMIS vs ODI and VAS Back/Leg scores. Independent t-tests and chi-squared tests were utilized to investigate significant differences in HNP measurements between the MCID+ and MCID- groups.

RESULTS

There were 88 MLD patients included in the study (Age=44.6±14.9, 38.6% female). PROMIS pain interference and pain intensity were strongly correlated with ODI and VAS Back/Leg (R≥0.505), and physical function correlated with ODI and VAS Back/Leg (R=-0.349) (all p<.01). The strongest MRI predictors of meeting HRQoL MCID were gray disc appearance, HNP area (>116.6 mm), and Hemi-Area Ratio (>51.8%). MCID+ patients were 2.7 times more likely to have a gray HNP MRI signal than a mixed or black HNP MRI signal in five out of six HRQoL score comparisons (p<.025). MCID+ patients had larger HNP areas than MCID- patients had in five out of six HRQoL score comparisons (116.6 mm±46.4 vs 90.0 mm±43.2, p<.04). MCID+ patients had a greater Hemi-Area Ratio than MCID- patients had in four out of six HRQoL score comparisons (51.8%±14.7 vs 43.9%±14.9, p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who met MCID after MLD had larger HNP areas and larger Hemi-HNP Areas than those who did not meet MCID. These patients were also 2.7× more likely to have a gray MRI signal than a mixed or black MRI signal. When accounting for HNP area relative to canal area, patients who met MCID had greater Hemi-HNP canal occupation than patients who did not meet MCID. The results of this study suggest that preoperative MRI parameters can be useful in predicting patient-reported improvement after MLD.

摘要

背景

腰椎间盘突出症(HNP)是一种常见的脊柱病理,常通过显微镜下腰椎间盘切除术(MLD)治疗,尽管先前的报告并未表明哪些术前 MRI 因素可能有助于 MLD 后显著改善临床症状。

目的

分析 HNP 患者的 MRI 特征,这些特征可预测 MLD 后健康相关生活质量评分(HRQoL)的显著改善。

研究设计/背景:对在一家机构接受 MLD 治疗 HNP 的患者进行为期 2 年的回顾性临床和放射学研究。

患者样本

88 名接受 MLD 治疗 HNP 的患者。

结局测量

颈椎管迁移;椎管和 HNP 前后长度和比例;椎管和 HNP 轴向面积和比例;半椎管和半 HNP 轴向面积和比例;椎间盘外观(黑、灰或混合);基线(BL)和 3 个月(3M)术后 HRQoL 评分。

方法

纳入接受 MLD 治疗 HNP 且具有 BL 和 3M PROMIS(身体机能、疼痛干扰和疼痛强度)、ODI、VAS 背部和 VAS 腿部评分的患者。使用 T2 轴位和矢状面 MRI 对颈椎管迁移、AP 长度、面积、半面积和椎间盘外观进行 HNP 和椎管测量。通过相应的椎管测量来计算 AP、面积和半面积比。使用每个ΔHRQoL 评分的已知最小临床重要差异(MCID),根据患者是否达到 MCID(MCID+)或未达到 MCID(MCID-)将患者分为两组。PROMIS 疼痛强度的 MCID 使用决策树计算。线性回归图说明了 PROMIS 与 ODI 和 VAS 背部/腿部评分之间的相关性。使用独立 t 检验和卡方检验来研究 MCID+和 MCID-组之间 HNP 测量值的显著差异。

结果

共有 88 名接受 MLD 治疗的患者纳入研究(年龄=44.6±14.9,38.6%为女性)。PROMIS 疼痛干扰和疼痛强度与 ODI 和 VAS 背部/腿部具有很强的相关性(R≥0.505),身体机能与 ODI 和 VAS 背部/腿部具有相关性(R=-0.349)(均 p<.01)。预测达到 HRQoL MCID 的最强 MRI 预测因素是灰色椎间盘信号、HNP 面积(>116.6mm)和半 HNP 面积比(>51.8%)。与混合或黑色 HNP MRI 信号相比,在五个 HRQoL 评分比较中,有六个比较中,MCID+患者有 2.7 倍的可能性具有灰色 HNP MRI 信号(p<.025)。与 MCID-患者相比,MCID+患者的 HNP 面积更大(116.6mm±46.4 比 90.0mm±43.2,p<.04)。与 MCID-患者相比,MCID+患者的半 HNP 面积比更大(51.8%±14.7 比 43.9%±14.9,p<.05)。

结论

在 MLD 后达到 MCID 的患者的 HNP 面积和半 HNP 面积比未达到 MCID 的患者大。这些患者有 2.7 倍的可能性具有灰色 MRI 信号,而不是混合或黑色 MRI 信号。当考虑到 HNP 面积相对于椎管面积时,达到 MCID 的患者的半 HNP 椎管占用率大于未达到 MCID 的患者。这项研究的结果表明,术前 MRI 参数可以用于预测 MLD 后患者报告的改善。

相似文献

1
Preoperative MRI predictors of health-related quality of life improvement after microscopic lumbar discectomy.显微镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗后健康相关生活质量改善的术前 MRI 预测因素。
Spine J. 2020 Mar;20(3):391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
MRI Radiological Predictors of Requiring Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy After Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症后需要显微镜下腰椎间盘切除术的MRI影像学预测指标
Global Spine J. 2020 Feb;10(1):63-68. doi: 10.1177/2192568219856345. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.腰椎间盘切除术后肌肉健康与患者报告结果的关系:早期结果。
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1677-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy.术前抑郁和躯体知觉量表与腰椎间盘切除术后残疾和生活质量的相关性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb;14(2):261-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10190. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
5
Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.经微创减压治疗后,腰椎狭窄症患者的主要腰痛得到改善。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 14;39(4):576-582. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23278. Print 2023 Oct 1.
6
PROMIS is superior to established outcome measures in capturing disability resulting from sagittal malalignment in patients with back pain.在捕捉背痛患者矢状面排列不齐导致的残疾方面,患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)优于既定的结局指标。
Spine Deform. 2020 Jun;8(3):499-505. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00068-7. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.满足患者的期望并实现背部残疾、背痛和腿痛的最小临床重要差异,可能为腰椎减压患者实现患者满意度提供预测效用。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e328-e335. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
8
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
9
How does preoperative opioid use impact postoperative health-related quality of life scores for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy?术前阿片类药物的使用如何影响行腰椎微创手术的患者术后健康相关生活质量评分?
Spine J. 2020 Aug;20(8):1196-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.094. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Comparison of outcomes between conventional lumbar fenestration discectomy and minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: an observational study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.传统腰椎开窗髓核切除术与微创腰椎间盘切除术的疗效比较:一项至少 2 年随访的观察性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Sep 24;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.PROMIS 在矫形外科临床结局中的要点和陷阱。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6617-6629. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04983-y. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
Assessing the quality of shared decision making for elective orthopedic surgery across a large healthcare system: cross-sectional survey study.评估大型医疗体系中择期骨科手术的共享决策质量:横断面调查研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 19;22(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04853-x.
3
Longitudinal Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for Back and Leg Pain in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
经皮微创腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰腿痛患者报告结局测量信息系统的纵向评估
Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):862-870. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938398.199. Epub 2020 Dec 31.