• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负责任研究与创新(RRI)——性别视角的实践与认知

The practice and perceptions of RRI-A gender perspective.

作者信息

Bührer Susanne, Wroblewski Angela

机构信息

Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Breslauer Str. 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany.

Institute for Advanced Studies IHS, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2019 Dec;77:101717. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101717. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101717
PMID:31580979
Abstract

Little is known to date about the practice and perceptions of RRI among researchers in Europe as well as the integration of the gender dimension into everyday RRI practices. This lack was addressed by two large-scale surveys that were launched in the course of the EU-funded MoRRI project (Monitoring the evolution and benefits of RRI, Contract number RTD-B6-PP-00964-2013, Duration 09/2013-03/2018). The analysis shows that the institutional environment positively influences the degree of RRI activities and the general attitudes towards more responsible research and innovation: researchers working in an institutional environment that systematically supports the practice of RRI are more active in RRI practices than researchers who do not rely on such structures. For the gender equality dimension, this means that institutions with a gender equality plan (GEP) in place are more inclined to support female researchers than institutions without such institutional incentives. Furthermore, researchers with experiences in EU-funded projects are more likely to be engaged in RRI activities. Even if female researchers have a stronger inclination to engage with society than their male counterparts, gender competence proves to be the relevant distinguishing criterion. Gender competent researchers are more often involved in other RRI activities.

摘要

迄今为止,对于欧洲研究人员在负责任的研究与创新(RRI)方面的实践和看法,以及性别层面如何融入日常RRI实践,我们知之甚少。欧盟资助的“监测RRI的演变与效益”(MoRRI)项目(合同编号:RTD - B6 - PP - 00964 - 2013,持续时间:2013年9月 - 2018年3月)开展的两项大规模调查解决了这一信息缺失问题。分析表明,机构环境对RRI活动的程度以及对更负责任的研究与创新的总体态度有积极影响:在系统支持RRI实践的机构环境中工作的研究人员,比不依赖此类结构的研究人员在RRI实践中更活跃。对于性别平等层面而言,这意味着设有性别平等计划(GEP)的机构比没有此类制度激励措施的机构更倾向于支持女性研究人员。此外,有参与欧盟资助项目经验的研究人员更有可能参与RRI活动。即使女性研究人员比男性研究人员更倾向于与社会互动,但性别能力被证明是相关的区分标准。具备性别能力的研究人员更常参与其他RRI活动。

相似文献

1
The practice and perceptions of RRI-A gender perspective.负责任研究与创新(RRI)——性别视角的实践与认知
Eval Program Plann. 2019 Dec;77:101717. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101717. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.实现负责任生物科学的结构转型(STARBIOS2):一项由“地平线2020”资助的欧洲多中心项目促进负责任研究与创新的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 7;8(3):e11745. doi: 10.2196/11745.
3
Responsible research and innovation training programs: implementation and evaluation of the HEIRRI project.负责任的研究与创新培训项目:HEIRRI 项目的实施与评估
Forensic Sci Res. 2021 Nov 2;6(4):320-330. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1970319. eCollection 2021.
4
Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe.研究联盟的治理:在欧洲实施负责任的研究与创新所面临的挑战。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Nov 16;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00109-z.
5
Contextualizing Security Innovation: Responsible Research and Innovation at the Smart Border?语境化安全创新:智慧边境的负责任研究与创新?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 18;27(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00292-y.
6
Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers.早期职业研究人员视角下的科研诚信实践
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1181-96. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9607-z. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
7
Creating a developmental framework for evaluating RRI implementation in research organisations.为研究组织中实施 RRI 的评估创建一个发展框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Oct;100:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102350. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
8
Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.责任装置:十余年纳米技术负责任研究与创新倡议
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1719-1746. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9978-z. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Science and gender: Scientists must work harder on equality.科学与性别:科学家必须在平等方面更加努力。
Nature. 2015 Dec 24;528(7583):471-3. doi: 10.1038/528471a.
10
Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize.仅仅是机器上的一个齿轮?纳米技术中研究人员的个人责任是实现集体化的义务。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):871-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1. Epub 2015 Nov 4.