• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Echocardiographic evaluation of the effects of sacubitril-valsartan on vascular properties in heart failure patients.超声心动图评价沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心力衰竭患者血管功能的影响。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;36(2):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01708-4. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
Effects of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition on pulmonary arterial stiffness in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者肺动脉僵硬度的影响。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;37(1):165-173. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01973-8. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Real-world treatment switching to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A cohort study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者实际应用中转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗:一项队列研究。
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001305.
4
Characteristics and Healthcare Utilization Among Veterans Treated for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Who Switched to Sacubitril/Valsartan.接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的射血分数降低型心力衰竭退伍军人的特征和医疗保健利用情况。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;12(11):e005691. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005691. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Effects of sacubutril/valsartan on nutritional status in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者营养状况的影响。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Jan;21(1):13-20. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000895.
6
Impact of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment on Diastolic Function in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者舒张功能的影响。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2021 Mar;28(2):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s40292-021-00437-x. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Functional Mitral Regurgitation.血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗功能性二尖瓣反流。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1354-1365. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037077.
8
The reverse remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的逆重构反应。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;36(4):e12435. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12435. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Switching from ramipril to sacubitril/valsartan favorably alters electrocardiographic indices of ventricular repolarization in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.从雷米普利转换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦可有益地改变射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的心室复极心电图指标。
Acta Cardiol. 2020 Feb;75(1):20-25. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1535818. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Clinical Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠片治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的临床疗效。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 17;10(16):e021459. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021459. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular mechanisms of sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac remodeling.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心脏重塑中的分子机制
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 8;13:892460. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.892460. eCollection 2022.
2
Cardiac and Vascular Remodeling After 6 Months of Therapy With Sacubitril/Valsartan: Mechanistic Insights From Advanced Echocardiographic Analysis.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗6个月后的心脏和血管重塑:高级超声心动图分析的机制见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 18;9:883769. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.883769. eCollection 2022.
3
Sacubitril/valsartan inhibits obesity-associated diastolic dysfunction through suppression of ventricular-vascular stiffness.沙库巴曲缬沙坦通过抑制心室血管僵硬度抑制肥胖相关舒张功能障碍。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 21;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01270-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to olmesartan on cardiovascular remodelling in subjects with essential hypertension: the results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对比奥美沙坦对原发性高血压患者心血管重构的影响:一项随机、双盲、阳性对照研究的结果。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 21;38(44):3308-3317. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx525.
2
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会对2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南特别工作组及美国心力衰竭学会的报告
Circulation. 2017 Aug 8;136(6):e137-e161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan on Central Hemodynamics in the Elderly With Systolic Hypertension: The PARAMETER Study.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与奥美沙坦对老年收缩期高血压患者中心血流动力学的影响:PARAMETER研究
Hypertension. 2017 Mar;69(3):411-420. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08556. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
4
Relation of Central Arterial Stiffness to Incident Heart Failure in the Community.社区中中心动脉僵硬度与新发心力衰竭的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Nov 23;4(11):e002189. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002189.
5
Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.超声心动图成人左心室容量和射血分数测量:美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像协会的更新建议。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.
6
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.血管紧张素-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与依那普利治疗心力衰竭的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
7
Aortic stiffness: pathophysiology, clinical implications, and approach to treatment.主动脉僵硬度:病理生理学、临床意义及治疗方法
Integr Blood Press Control. 2014 May 23;7:29-34. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S59535. eCollection 2014.
8
The prognostic value of arterial stiffness in systolic heart failure.动脉僵硬度在收缩性心力衰竭中的预后价值。
Cardiol J. 2013;20(6):665-71. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0168.
9
Aortic root remodeling and risk of heart failure in the Framingham Heart study.弗雷明汉心脏研究中主动脉根部重塑与心力衰竭风险
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Feb;1(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2012.10.003.
10
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):1810-52. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8807. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

超声心动图评价沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心力衰竭患者血管功能的影响。

Echocardiographic evaluation of the effects of sacubitril-valsartan on vascular properties in heart failure patients.

机构信息

Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5758 S. Maryland Ave., MC 9067, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;36(2):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01708-4. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10554-019-01708-4
PMID:31583499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7135917/
Abstract

Increased vascular stiffness is known to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The effects of sacubitril-valsartan on vascular structure and function have not been systematically studied in this patient population. We hypothesized that aortic distensibility (AD) and fractional area change (AFAC), as assessed by 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), would improve over time in HFrEF patients on sacubitril-valsartan therapy, due to the vasodilatory properties of the medication. We prospectively studied 30 patients with HFrEF (25 < EF < 40%) on optimal guideline-directed medical therapy who were subsequently started on sacubitril-valsartan. Patients underwent serial 2D TTE imaging at baseline, 3 and 6 months following therapy initiation. Ascending aortic diameters were measured 3 cm above the aortic valve in the parasternal long-axis view and used to calculate AD and AFAC, two markers of vascular compliance. For reference, we also measured AD and AFAC in 30 healthy, age and gender-matched controls at a single time point. Normal controls had significantly higher values of AD and AFAC than HFrEF patients at baseline (AD: 4.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9 cmdyne10, p < 0.0001 and AFAC: 18.8 ± 3.7% vs. 10.3 ± 4.3%, p < 0.0001). In HFrEF patients on sacubitril-valsartan, both indices of aortic compliance progressively improved towards normal from baseline to 6 months: AD from 2.2 ± 0.9 to 3.6 ± 1.5 cmdyne10 (p < 0.0001) and AFAC from 10.3 ± 4.3 to 13.7 ± 4.1% (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, AD and AFAC are decreased in patients with HFrEF and gradually improve with sacubitril-valsartan treatment. The echocardiographic markers used in this study may become a useful tool to assess the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan therapy in HFrEF patients.

摘要

已知血管僵硬度增加是射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者死亡率的独立预测因素。沙库巴曲缬沙坦对该患者人群的血管结构和功能的影响尚未进行系统研究。我们假设由于药物的血管扩张特性,HFrEF 患者在接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗后,通过二维经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估的主动脉扩张性(AD)和面积分数变化(AFAC)会随着时间的推移而改善。我们前瞻性研究了 30 名接受最佳指南指导的药物治疗的 HFrEF 患者(25%<EF<40%),随后开始接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗。患者在治疗开始后 3 个月和 6 个月进行了连续的 2D TTE 成像。在胸骨旁长轴视图中,在主动脉瓣上方 3cm 处测量升主动脉直径,并用于计算 AD 和 AFAC,这两个血管顺应性标志物。作为参考,我们还在单个时间点测量了 30 名健康、年龄和性别匹配的对照者的 AD 和 AFAC。正常对照组的 AD 和 AFAC 值明显高于基线时的 HFrEF 患者(AD:4.0±1.1 比 2.2±0.9 cmdyne10,p<0.0001;AFAC:18.8±3.7%比 10.3±4.3%,p<0.0001)。在接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的 HFrEF 患者中,从基线到 6 个月,主动脉顺应性的两个指标均逐渐向正常方向改善:AD 从 2.2±0.9 增加到 3.6±1.5 cmdyne10(p<0.0001),AFAC 从 10.3±4.3 增加到 13.7±4.1%(p<0.0001)。总之,HFrEF 患者的 AD 和 AFAC 降低,并随着沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗逐渐改善。本研究中使用的超声心动图标志物可能成为评估沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗 HFrEF 患者疗效的有用工具。