Mepani Anita M, Kirk Sarah A, Hancock Kenneth E, Bennett Kara, de Gruttola Victor, Liberman M Charles, Maison Stéphane F
Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb;41(1):25-38. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000804.
Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure, ototoxic drugs, or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. The silencing of these neurons, especially those with high thresholds and low spontaneous rates, degrades auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties in understanding speech in noise. Although cochlear synaptopathy can be diagnosed in animals by measuring suprathreshold auditory brainstem responses, its diagnosis in humans remains a challenge. In mice, cochlear synaptopathy is also correlated with measures of middle ear muscle (MEM) reflex strength, possibly because the missing high-threshold neurons are important drivers of this reflex. The authors hypothesized that measures of the MEM reflex might be better than other assays of peripheral function in predicting difficulties hearing in difficult listening environments in human subjects.
The authors recruited 165 normal-hearing healthy subjects, between 18 and 63 years of age, with no history of ear or hearing problems, no history of neurologic disorders, and unremarkable otoscopic examinations. Word recognition in quiet and in difficult listening situations was measured in four ways: using isolated words from the Northwestern University auditory test number six corpus with either (a) 0 dB signal to noise, (b) 45% time compression with reverberation, or (c) 65% time compression with reverberation, and (d) with a modified version of the QuickSIN. Audiometric thresholds were assessed at standard and extended high frequencies. Outer hair cell function was assessed by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Middle ear function and reflexes were assessed using three methods: the acoustic reflex threshold as measured clinically, wideband tympanometry as measured clinically, and a custom wideband method that uses a pair of click probes flanking an ipsilateral noise elicitor. Other aspects of peripheral auditory function were assessed by measuring click-evoked gross potentials, that is, summating potential (SP) and action potential (AP) from ear canal electrodes.
After adjusting for age and sex, word recognition scores were uncorrelated with audiometric or DPOAE thresholds, at either standard or extended high frequencies. MEM reflex thresholds were significantly correlated with scores on isolated word recognition, but not with the modified version of the QuickSIN. The highest pairwise correlations were seen using the custom assay. AP measures were correlated with some of the word scores, but not as highly as seen for the MEM custom assay, and only if amplitude was measured from SP peak to AP peak, rather than baseline to AP peak. The highest pairwise correlations with word scores, on all four tests, were seen with the SP/AP ratio, followed closely by SP itself. When all predictor variables were combined in a stepwise multivariate regression, SP/AP dominated models for all four word score outcomes. MEM measures only enhanced the adjusted r values for the 45% time compression test. The only other predictors that enhanced model performance (and only for two outcome measures) were measures of interaural threshold asymmetry.
Results suggest that, among normal-hearing subjects, there is a significant peripheral contribution to diminished hearing performance in difficult listening environments that is not captured by either threshold audiometry or DPOAEs. The significant univariate correlations between word scores and either SP/AP, SP, MEM reflex thresholds, or AP amplitudes (in that order) are consistent with a type of primary neural degeneration. However, interpretation is clouded by uncertainty as to the mix of pre- and postsynaptic contributions to the click-evoked SP. None of the assays presented here has the sensitivity to diagnose neural degeneration on a case-by-case basis; however, these tests may be useful in longitudinal studies to track accumulation of neural degeneration in individual subjects.
噪声暴露、耳毒性药物或衰老后永久性阈值升高是由感觉细胞丢失引起的;然而,动物研究表明,毛细胞丢失之前通常是感觉细胞与听神经纤维之间突触的退化。这些神经元的沉默,尤其是那些阈值高且自发放电率低的神经元,会降低听觉处理能力,并可能导致在噪声环境中理解语音困难。虽然可以通过测量阈上听觉脑干反应在动物中诊断耳蜗突触病变,但其在人类中的诊断仍然是一项挑战。在小鼠中,耳蜗突触病变也与中耳肌肉(MEM)反射强度的测量相关,可能是因为缺失的高阈值神经元是该反射的重要驱动因素。作者假设,在预测人类受试者在困难聆听环境中的听力困难方面,MEM反射测量可能比其他外周功能检测方法更好。
作者招募了165名年龄在18至63岁之间、听力正常的健康受试者,他们没有耳部或听力问题史、没有神经系统疾病史,耳镜检查正常。通过四种方式测量安静和困难聆听情况下的单词识别能力:使用西北大学听觉测试六号语料库中的孤立单词,分别为(a)0 dB信噪比,(b)45%时间压缩并伴有混响,(c)65%时间压缩并伴有混响,以及(d)使用QuickSIN的修改版本。在标准和扩展高频下评估听力阈值。通过畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)评估外毛细胞功能。使用三种方法评估中耳功能和反射:临床测量的声反射阈值、临床测量的宽带鼓室图,以及一种使用一对位于同侧噪声激发器两侧的点击探头的定制宽带方法。通过测量点击诱发的总电位,即来自耳道电极的总和电位(SP)和动作电位(AP),评估外周听觉功能的其他方面。
在调整年龄和性别后,单词识别分数与标准或扩展高频下的听力阈值或DPOAE阈值均无相关性。MEM反射阈值与孤立单词识别分数显著相关,但与QuickSIN的修改版本无关。使用定制检测方法时观察到的成对相关性最高。AP测量与一些单词分数相关,但不如MEM定制检测方法高,并且仅当从SP峰值到AP峰值测量幅度时,而不是从基线到AP峰值测量时才相关。在所有四项测试中,与单词分数成对相关性最高的是SP/AP比值,其次是SP本身。当所有预测变量在逐步多元回归中组合时,SP/AP在所有四项单词分数结果的模型中占主导地位。MEM测量仅提高了45%时间压缩测试的调整r值。唯一其他提高模型性能的预测因素(且仅适用于两项结果测量)是耳间阈值不对称测量。
结果表明,在听力正常的受试者中,在困难聆听环境中听力表现下降存在显著的外周因素,而阈值听力测定或DPOAE均未捕捉到这一点。单词分数与SP/AP、SP、MEM反射阈值或AP幅度(按此顺序)之间显著的单变量相关性与一种原发性神经变性类型一致。然而,由于对于点击诱发的SP的突触前和突触后贡献的混合存在不确定性,解释变得模糊。这里介绍的任何一种检测方法都没有在个体病例基础上诊断神经变性的敏感性;然而,这些测试在纵向研究中可能有助于追踪个体受试者神经变性的积累。