Chouairi Fouad, Mets Elbert J, Gabrick Kyle S, Alperovich Michael
Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New Haven, CT.
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(8):2372-2374. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005918.
The Veau classification represents the most commonly used system for characterizing cleft palate severity. Conflicting evidence exists as to how increasing Veau classification affects outcomes. This study compared perioperative outcomes between Veau III and IV cleft palate repairs.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database was used to identify cleft palate repairs between 2012 and 2016 using CPT codes. Patients with alveolar bone grafts were excluded. Veau III (unilateral) and Veau IV (bilateral) cleft palate repairs were identified using International Classification of Disease code 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and -10 codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and adverse events were compared between the cohorts.
A total of 5026 patients underwent cleft palate repair between 2012 and 2016. Of the 2114 patients with identifiable Veau classification, 1302 had Veau III cleft palates and 812 had Veau IV cleft palates.The Veau IV cleft palate patient population was older (377.8 versus 354.1 days, P < 0.001) and had significantly more comorbidities including a higher incidence of chronic lung disease (P = 0.014), airway abnormalities (P = 0.001), developmental delay (P = 0.018), structural central nervous system deformities (P < 0.001), and nutritional support (P < 0.001). Veau IV cleft palate repairs also had longer operative times (153.2 versus 140.2 minutes, P < 0.001). Despite significant differences in comorbidities and perioperative factors, there were no differences in 30-day complications, readmissions, or reoperation rates between Veau III and IV cleft palate repairs.
Patients undergoing Veau IV cleft palate repair have a significantly greater number of comorbidities than Veau III cleft palate repairs. Despite differences in patient populations, 30-day surgical outcomes are comparable between the cohorts.
韦奥分类法是描述腭裂严重程度最常用的系统。关于韦奥分类增加如何影响治疗结果,存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究比较了韦奥III型和IV型腭裂修复术的围手术期结果。
利用国家外科质量改进计划儿科(NSQIP-P)数据库,通过现行程序编码(CPT)识别2012年至2016年间的腭裂修复术。排除接受牙槽骨移植的患者。使用国际疾病分类代码9和10(ICD-9和-10代码)识别韦奥III型(单侧)和韦奥IV型(双侧)腭裂修复术。比较两组患者的人口统计学、合并症和不良事件。
2012年至2016年间,共有5026例患者接受了腭裂修复术。在2114例可确定韦奥分类的患者中,1302例为韦奥III型腭裂,812例为韦奥IV型腭裂。韦奥IV型腭裂患者年龄更大(377.8天对354.1天,P<0.001),合并症显著更多,包括慢性肺病发病率更高(P=0.014)、气道异常(P=0.001)、发育迟缓(P=0.018)、中枢神经系统结构畸形(P<0.001)和营养支持(P<0.001)。韦奥IV型腭裂修复术的手术时间也更长(153.2分钟对140.2分钟,P<0.001)。尽管合并症和围手术期因素存在显著差异,但韦奥III型和IV型腭裂修复术在30天并发症、再入院率或再次手术率方面没有差异。
接受韦奥IV型腭裂修复术的患者合并症数量明显多于韦奥III型腭裂修复术。尽管患者群体存在差异,但两组的30天手术结果相当。