Department of Animal Ecology & Physiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mol Ecol. 2019 Nov;28(22):4864-4882. doi: 10.1111/mec.15259. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
Since the first molecular study providing evidence for mating outside the pair bond in birds over 30 years ago, >500 studies have reported rates of extra-pair paternity (EPP) in >300 bird species. Here, we give a detailed overview of the current literature reporting EPP in birds and highlight the sampling biases and patterns in the data set with respect to taxonomy, avian phylogeny and global regions, knowledge of which will be crucial for correct interpretation of results in future comparative studies. Subsequently, we use this comprehensive dataset to simultaneously test the role of several ecological and life history variables. We do not find clear evidence that variation in EPP across socially monogamous species can be explained by latitude, density (coloniality), migration, generation length, genetic structuring (dispersal distance), or climatic variability, after accounting for phylogeny. These results contrast previous studies, most likely due to the large heterogeneity within species in both EPP and the predictor of interest, indicating that using species averages might be unreliable. Despite the absence of broadscale ecological drivers in explaining interspecific variation in EPP, we suggest that certain behaviours and ecological variables might facilitate or constrain EPP, as indicated by our finding that EPP was negatively associated with latitude within noncolonial species, suggesting a role of breeding synchrony. Thus, rather than focussing on general explanations for variation in EPP across all species, a future focus should be on how various aspects of ecology or life history might have driven variation in EPP among groups of species or populations of the same species. Hence, we argue that variation in EPP can be partly explained when taking the right perspective. This comprehensive overview, and particularly the dataset provided herein will create a foundation for further studies.
自 30 多年前首次有研究从分子水平上证明鸟类中的交配行为超出了配对关系以来,已有超过 500 项研究报道了超过 300 种鸟类中的额外配对亲代(EPP)的比率。在这里,我们详细概述了目前关于鸟类中 EPP 的文献,并强调了数据集在分类学、鸟类系统发育和全球区域方面的采样偏差和模式,这些知识对于正确解释未来比较研究的结果至关重要。随后,我们使用这个综合数据集同时测试了几个生态和生活史变量的作用。我们没有发现明确的证据表明,在社会一夫一妻制物种中,EPP 的变化可以用纬度、密度(群居性)、迁徙、世代长度、遗传结构(扩散距离)或气候变异性来解释,这些变化在考虑到系统发育后仍然存在。这些结果与之前的研究形成对比,最有可能的原因是物种内 EPP 和感兴趣的预测因子的变异性很大,这表明使用物种平均值可能不可靠。尽管没有广泛的生态驱动因素可以解释 EPP 在种间变异中的作用,但我们认为某些行为和生态变量可能会促进或限制 EPP,正如我们发现非群居物种中 EPP 与纬度呈负相关所表明的那样,这表明繁殖同步性可能发挥了作用。因此,未来的重点不应是寻找 EPP 在所有物种中变化的一般解释,而应是关注生态学或生活史的各个方面如何在物种或同一物种的种群群体中驱动 EPP 的变化。因此,我们认为,从正确的角度出发,可以部分解释 EPP 的变化。这个全面的概述,特别是本文提供的数据集,将为进一步的研究奠定基础。