Ward Robyn C, Krogh Mary Anne, Kremer Michael J, Muckle Timothy J, Schoeny Michael E
is assistant program director at the Florida State University Nurse Anesthesia Program in Panama City, Florida. This manuscript was part of her PhD requirements at Rush University in Chicago, Illinois.
is an associate professor and dean of nursing at Mount Marty College, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
AANA J. 2019 Feb;87(1):29-36.
Chronic pain is a growing epidemic in America. Challenges in patients' access to care, and in reimbursement to Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) who provide pain services, have resulted in a voluntary subspecialty certification in nonsurgical pain management (NSPM) for CRNAs. An evaluation was conducted of perceptions of CRNAs toward the value of certification in NSPM. An invitation to complete the Perceived Value of Certification Tool (PVCT) was sent to 474 CRNAs who identified the subspecialty practice of NSPM upon application for recertification to the NBCRNA. Data were collected on 18 factors related to the perceived value of certification in the NSPM subspecialty. Exploratory factor analysis using principal components analysis with varimax rotation was conducted to assess the latent structure of the PVCT and to identify potential constructs of CRNAs' perceptions. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach α coefficients. Of 64 CRNAs who provided data, a 3-factor solution emerged that explained 72.25% of the overall variance: personal satisfaction, professional recognition, and competence, each with excellent to good reliability (F1: α = 0.95, F2: α = 0.94, F3: α = 0.88). Identification of the 3 constructs in this study will assist with future efforts of examination validation for the subspecialty of NSPM certification for CRNAs.
慢性疼痛在美国正日益成为一种流行病。患者在获得护理方面面临挑战,以及为提供疼痛服务的注册护士麻醉师(CRNA)报销费用方面存在问题,这导致了CRNA的非手术疼痛管理(NSPM)自愿亚专业认证。对CRNA对NSPM认证价值的看法进行了评估。向474名在申请重新认证至美国国家认证注册护士麻醉师委员会(NBCRNA)时确定从事NSPM亚专业实践的CRNA发送了完成认证感知价值工具(PVCT)的邀请。收集了与NSPM亚专业认证感知价值相关的18个因素的数据。使用主成分分析和方差最大化旋转进行探索性因素分析,以评估PVCT的潜在结构,并识别CRNA认知的潜在结构。使用克朗巴哈α系数评估信度。在提供数据的64名CRNA中,出现了一个三因素解决方案,解释了总体方差的72.25%:个人满意度、专业认可和能力,每个因素的信度都从优秀到良好(F1:α = 0.95,F2:α = 0.94,F3:α = 0.88)。本研究中这三个结构的识别将有助于未来对CRNA的NSPM认证亚专业考试验证的努力。