Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Nov;45(11):1547-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
To estimate ophthalmologist-level variation in cataract surgery billing and evaluate patient and ophthalmologist characteristics associated with complex cataract surgery coding.
Cross-sectional study.
Retrospective case series.
Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who had cataract surgery between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were included. Billing of cataract surgery as complex versus routine and patient and physician characteristics associated with billing of cataract surgery as complex were evaluated.
An estimated 3.5 million cataract procedures were performed on Medicare beneficiaries in 2016 and 2017. Men (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-1.82), patients 75 years or older (versus those aged 65 to 74 years: OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.33-1.36), and racial minorities (blacks versus whites: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.75-1.85) had increased odds of having cataract surgery coded as complex. The mean rate of coding for complex cataract surgery by individual surgeons (n = 10 075) in the United States was 11.2%, with significant variation. A high-risk clinical diagnosis code was associated with 40.0% of complex cataract surgeries. Adjusted for patient characteristics, ophthalmologists who graduated from medical school within the past 10 years (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.49) were more likely to code for complex cataract surgery. Higher volume ophthalmologists were less likely to code for complex cataract surgery than low-volume ophthalmologists.
There was marked variation among ophthalmologists in the use of complex cataract surgery. Some variability might represent inaccurate coding and was not entirely based on differences in referral patterns for more complex patients.
评估白内障手术计费中眼科医生水平的差异,并评估与复杂白内障手术编码相关的患者和眼科医生特征。
横断面研究。
回顾性病例系列。
纳入 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间接受白内障手术的 65 岁及以上医疗保险受益人。评估白内障手术作为复杂手术与常规手术的计费情况,以及与白内障手术计费为复杂手术相关的患者和医生特征。
在 2016 年和 2017 年,医疗保险受益人为白内障手术支付了约 350 万例手术费用。男性(优势比 [OR],1.79;95%置信区间 [CI],1.75-1.82)、75 岁及以上患者(与 65 至 74 岁患者相比:OR,1.35;95%CI,1.33-1.36)和少数民族(黑人与白人相比:OR,1.80;95%CI,1.75-1.85)的白内障手术被编码为复杂手术的可能性更高。美国 10075 名单独外科医生(n)的复杂白内障手术编码平均率为 11.2%,差异显著。高风险临床诊断代码与 40.0%的复杂白内障手术相关。调整患者特征后,过去 10 年内毕业于医学院的眼科医生(OR,1.35;95%CI,1.22-1.49)更有可能对复杂白内障手术进行编码。高容量的眼科医生比低容量的眼科医生更不可能对复杂白内障手术进行编码。
在白内障手术使用方面,眼科医生之间存在明显差异。一些差异可能代表不准确的编码,并且不完全基于对更复杂患者的转诊模式的差异。