Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, and.
Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University; and.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Oct 1;17(10):1194-1202. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7314.
Provider experience, or clinical volume, is associated with improved outcomes in many complex healthcare settings. Despite increased complexity of anticancer therapies, studies evaluating physician-level experience and cancer treatment outcomes are lacking.
A population-based study was conducted of older adults (aged ≥66 years) diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2004 through 2011 using SEER-Medicare data. Analysis focused on outcomes in patients receiving rituximab, the first approved monoclonal anticancer immunotherapy. We hypothesized that lower physician experience using rituximab and managing its infusion-related reactions would be associated with early treatment discontinuation. A 12-month look-back from each initiation of rituximab was used to categorize physician volume (0, 1-2, or ≥3 initiations per year). Modified Poisson regression was used to account for provider-level correlation and estimated relative risk (RR) of early rituximab discontinuation (<3 cycles within 180 days of rituximab initiation). Cox proportional hazards were used to measure the impact of rituximab discontinuation on survival.
Among 15,110 patients who initiated rituximab with 2,684 physicians, 7.6% experienced early rituximab discontinuation. Approximately one-fourth of patients (26.1%) initiated rituximab with a physician who had no rituximab initiations during the preceding 12 months. Compared with patients treated by physicians who had ≥3 rituximab initiations in the prior year, those treated by physicians without initiations were 57% more likely to experience early discontinuation (adjusted RR [aRR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.35-1.82; P<.001 for 0 vs ≥3, and aRR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37; P=.02 for 1-2 vs ≥3). Additionally, rituximab discontinuation was associated with higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.28-1.52; P<.001).
Lower oncologist experience with rituximab was associated with increased risk of early rituximab discontinuation in Medicare beneficiaries with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Physician-level volume may be an important factor in providing high-quality cancer care in the modern era.
在许多复杂的医疗保健环境中,提供者的经验(即临床量)与改善结果有关。尽管抗癌治疗的复杂性增加,但评估医师水平经验和癌症治疗结果的研究仍然缺乏。
使用 SEER-Medicare 数据,对 2004 年至 2011 年间诊断为 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的年龄≥66 岁的老年人进行了一项基于人群的研究。分析集中在接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者的结局上,利妥昔单抗是第一种被批准的单克隆抗癌免疫疗法。我们假设,医师使用利妥昔单抗和管理其输注相关反应的经验较低,与早期治疗停药相关。从每次开始使用利妥昔单抗开始的 12 个月回顾期用于分类医师的量(每年 0、1-2 或≥3 次启动)。使用修正泊松回归来解释提供者水平的相关性,并估计早期利妥昔单抗停药的相对风险(RR)(利妥昔单抗开始后 180 天内小于 3 个周期)。使用 Cox 比例风险来衡量利妥昔单抗停药对生存的影响。
在 15110 名开始接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者中,有 7.6%经历了早期利妥昔单抗停药。大约四分之一的患者(26.1%)开始接受利妥昔单抗治疗时,其医生在前 12 个月内没有启动过利妥昔单抗治疗。与由在前一年中至少进行了 3 次利妥昔单抗启动的医生治疗的患者相比,由没有启动的医生治疗的患者早期停药的可能性高 57%(校正 RR [aRR],1.57;95%CI,1.35-1.82;P<.001 用于 0 与≥3,aRR,1.19;95%CI,1.03-1.37;P=.02 用于 1-2 与≥3)。此外,利妥昔单抗停药与死亡风险增加相关(校正危害比,1.39;95%CI,1.28-1.52;P<.001)。
在接受非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗的医疗保险受益人中,肿瘤学家使用利妥昔单抗的经验较少与早期利妥昔单抗停药的风险增加相关。医师水平的量可能是在现代提供高质量癌症护理的重要因素。