Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):454-463. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30103-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
Advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma represents a heterogeneous group of patients with different risk profiles. Data suggests that interim PET assessment during chemotherapy is superior to baseline international prognostic scoring in terms of predicting long-term treatment outcome in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. We therefore hypothesised that early interim PET-imaging after two courses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) might be suitable for guiding treatment in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. We aimed to assess whether intensifying standard chemotherapy (BEACOPP) by adding rituximab would improve progression-free survival in patients with positive PET after two courses of chemotherapy.
In this open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 study, we recruited patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma from 160 hospitals and 77 private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. Interim PET-imaging was done after two cycles of BEACOPP and centrally assessed by an expert panel. Patients with a positive PET after 2 cycles of BEACOPP chemotherapy (PET-2) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six additional courses of either BEACOPP (BEACOPP group) or BEACOPP plus rituximab (R-BEACOPP group). PET-2 was assessed using a 5-point scale with FDG uptake higher than the mediastinal blood pool (corresponding to Deauville scale 3) defined as positive. BEACOPP was given as previously described; rituximab was given intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m (maximum total dose 700 mg), the first administration starting 24 h before starting the fourth cycle of BEACOPP (day 0 and day 3 in cycle 4, day 1 in cycles 5-8). Randomisation was done centrally and used the minimisation method including a random component, stratified according to centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, and sex. The primary efficacy endpoint was 5 year progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. We are reporting this second planned interim analysis as the final report of the trial. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00515554.
Between May 14, 2008, and May 31, 2011, we enrolled 1100 patients. 440 patients had a positive PET-2 and were randomly assigned to either the BEACOPP group (n=220) or the R-BEACOPP group (n=220). With a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 25-42) for progression-free survival, estimated 3 year progression-free survival was 91·4% (95% CI 87·0-95·7) for patients in the BEACOPP group and 93·0% (89·4-96·6) for those in the R-BEACOPP group (difference 1·6%, 95% CI -4·0 to 7·3; log rank p=0·99). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (207 [95%] of 218 patients in the BEACOPP group vs 211 [96%] of 220 patients in the R-BEACOPP group), and severe infections (51 [23%] vs 43 [20%] patients). Based on a futility analysis, the independent data monitoring committee recommended publication of this second planned interim analysis as the final result. Six (3%) of 219 patients in the BEACOPP group and ten (5%) of 220 in the R-BEACOPP group died; fatal treatment-related toxic effects occurred in one (<1%) patient in the BEACOPP group and three (1%) in the R-BEACOPP group, all of them due to infection.
The addition of rituximab to BEACOPP did not improve the progression-free survival of PET-2 positive patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, progression-free survival for PET-2 positive patients was much better than expected, exceeding even the outcome of PET-2-unselected patients in the previous HD15 trial. Thus, PET-2 cannot identify patients at high-risk for treatment failure in the context of the very effective German Hodgkin Study Group standard treatment for advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Deutsche Krebshilfe; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI); and Roche Pharma.
晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤代表了一组具有不同风险特征的异质性患者。数据表明,与基线国际预后评分相比,化疗期间的中期 PET 评估在预测霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的长期治疗结果方面更具优势。因此,我们假设在接受两周期博来霉素、依托泊苷、多柔比星、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、丙卡巴肼和泼尼松(BEACOPP)化疗后进行早期中期 PET 成像可能适合指导晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的治疗。我们旨在评估在化疗后两周期 PET 阳性的患者中,增加利妥昔单抗的标准化疗(BEACOPP)是否会改善无进展生存期。
在这项开放标签、国际、随机、3 期研究中,我们从德国、瑞士、奥地利、荷兰和捷克共和国的 160 家医院和 77 家私人诊所招募了新诊断为晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的年龄在 18-60 岁的患者。在接受两周期 BEACOPP 化疗后进行中期 PET 成像,并由专家小组进行中心评估。在两周期 BEACOPP 化疗后 PET 阳性(PET-2)的患者随机分为(1:1)接受六周期的 BEACOPP(BEACOPP 组)或 BEACOPP 加利妥昔单抗(R-BEACOPP 组)。使用 FDG 摄取高于纵隔血池(对应于 Deauville 评分 3)的 5 分制评估 PET-2,定义为阳性。BEACOPP 按先前描述给予;利妥昔单抗静脉注射剂量为 375mg/m2(最大总剂量 700mg),第一次给药在开始第四周期 BEACOPP 前 24 小时(第 4 周期的第 0 天和第 3 天,第 5-8 周期的第 1 天)。随机分组由中央进行,并使用最小化方法,包括随机成分,按中心、年龄、分期、国际预后评分和性别分层。主要疗效终点是无进展生存期,在意向治疗人群中进行分析。我们报告这是该试验的第二次计划中期分析,也是该试验的最终报告。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00515554。
在 2008 年 5 月 14 日至 2011 年 5 月 31 日期间,我们招募了 1100 名患者。440 名患者的 PET-2 阳性,随机分为 BEACOPP 组(n=220)或 R-BEACOPP 组(n=220)。无进展生存期的中位随访时间为 33 个月(IQR 25-42),BEACOPP 组的估计 3 年无进展生存期为 91.4%(95%CI 87.0-95.7),R-BEACOPP 组为 93.0%(89.4-96.6)(差异 1.6%,95%CI -4.0 至 7.3;对数秩检验 p=0.99)。常见的 3-4 级不良事件为白细胞减少症(218 名患者中的 207 名[95%],220 名患者中的 211 名[96%])和严重感染(51 名[23%],220 名患者中的 43 名[20%])。根据无效性分析,独立数据监测委员会建议发布这项第二次计划的中期分析作为最终结果。在 BEACOPP 组的 219 名患者中,有 6 名(3%)患者死亡;在 R-BEACOPP 组的 220 名患者中,有 10 名(5%)患者死亡;在 BEACOPP 组中,有 1 名(<1%)患者发生致命的治疗相关毒性反应,在 R-BEACOPP 组中,有 3 名(1%)患者发生致命的治疗相关毒性反应,均因感染所致。
在 PET-2 阳性的晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,增加利妥昔单抗对 BEACOPP 并未改善无进展生存期。然而,PET-2 阳性患者的无进展生存期远远好于预期,甚至超过了之前 HD15 试验中 PET-2 未选择的患者的结果。因此,在德国霍奇金研究组标准治疗晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的情况下,PET-2 不能确定治疗失败风险高的患者。
德国癌症援助组织;瑞士国家教育、研究和创新署(SERI);罗氏制药。