Former Resident, Post-Graduate Prosthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Conn; Private practice, Boston, Mass.
Program Director and Maxillofacial Prosthodontist, Post-Graduate Prosthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Conn; Private practice, Meriden, Conn.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Apr;123(4):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
The anterior mandible has conventionally been deemed as a safe zone for dental implants. However, with the evolution of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), several anatomic challenges have been identified that, if violated, can lead to surgical complications, including life-threatening hemorrhage.
The purpose of this observational clinical study was to obtain standardized average values for the location of the sublingual artery (SLA), submental artery (SMA), and mandibular incisive canal (MIC) and to determine whether differences exist between dentate and edentulous individuals. In addition, the prevalence of these anatomic landmarks on CBCT images was determined. An additional objective was to study the cross-sectional morphology of the anterior mandible.
CBCT images of 125 edentulous and 100 dentate patients were studied at the anterior mandible for the prevalence of SLA, SMA, and MIC. Measurements of these 3 structures were then made from the inferior cortical border of the mandible to the superior border of each structure to obtain average anatomic measurements. The cross-sectional shapes of anterior mandibles were then categorized, and the prevalence of each shape in this sample was calculated.
The prevalence of SLA across all 225 CBCT images was 100% for edentulous patients and 98% for dentate patients. The SLA was located approximately 15 mm above the inferior border of the mandible. The prevalence of SMA was 94% for edentulous patients and 88% for dentate patients. The SMA was located approximately 5 mm above the inferior border of the mandible. The prevalence of MIC was 61% for edentulous patients and 59% for dentate patients. The MIC was located approximately 11 mm above the inferior border of the mandible in edentulous patients and approximately 14 mm above the inferior border of the mandible in dentate patients. Five distinct shapes were observed for the cross-sectional morphology of the anterior mandible: hourglass (1%), pear (53%), sickle (4%), ovoid (26%), and triangular (17%). The distance from the crest of the residual ridge to a minimum 6-mm width in the anterior mandible was approximately 4 mm.
The SLA and SMA vascular structures were consistently identified in the anterior mandible on CBCT images, both in dentate and edentulous patients, whereas the mandibular incisive canal was not consistently visualized. Average values from the inferior border of the mandible to the SLA, SMA, and MIC were computable. The cross-sectional morphology of the anterior mandible is diverse in dentate and edentulous mandibles, with pear shaped being the most common in both. These findings should be taken into consideration when dental implants are planned in the anterior mandible.
传统上认为下颌前牙区为种植牙的安全区。然而,随着锥形束 CT(CBCT)的发展,已经确定了一些解剖学上的挑战,如果违反这些挑战,可能会导致手术并发症,包括危及生命的出血。
本观察性临床研究的目的是获得舌下动脉(SLA)、颏下动脉(SMA)和下颌切牙管(MIC)位置的标准化平均值,并确定有牙和无牙个体之间是否存在差异。此外,还确定了这些解剖标志在 CBCT 图像上的出现率。另一个目的是研究下颌前牙的横断形态。
对 125 名无牙和 100 名有牙患者的下颌前牙进行 CBCT 图像研究,以确定 SLA、SMA 和 MIC 的出现率。然后,从下颌骨的下皮质缘到每个结构的上缘测量这些 3 个结构,以获得平均解剖测量值。然后对下颌前牙的横断形态进行分类,并计算出该样本中每种形态的出现率。
在所有 225 例 CBCT 图像中,无牙患者的 SLA 出现率为 100%,有牙患者为 98%。SLA 位于下颌骨下缘上方约 15mm 处。无牙患者 SMA 的出现率为 94%,有牙患者为 88%。SMA 位于下颌骨下缘上方约 5mm 处。无牙患者 MIC 的出现率为 61%,有牙患者为 59%。无牙患者 MIC 位于下颌骨下缘上方约 11mm 处,有牙患者位于下颌骨下缘上方约 14mm 处。下颌前牙的横断形态观察到 5 种不同的形态:沙漏形(1%)、梨形(53%)、镰刀形(4%)、卵圆形(26%)和三角形(17%)。在前牙区,从剩余牙槽嵴的嵴顶到 6mm 宽的最小宽度的距离约为 4mm。
在 CBCT 图像中,无论是有牙还是无牙患者,都能在下颌前牙区一致地识别 SLA 和 SMA 血管结构,而下颌切牙管则不能一致地显示。从下颌骨下缘到 SLA、SMA 和 MIC 的平均值是可计算的。下颌前牙的横断形态在有牙和无牙的下颌骨中是多种多样的,其中梨形最为常见。在计划下颌前牙种植牙时应考虑到这些发现。