• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往腹部手术对儿童腹腔镜辅助开放式阑尾-膀胱吻合术(Mitrofanoff)效果的影响:一项对比研究。

Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopy-assisted open appendicovesicostomy (Mitrofanoff) creation in children: a comparative study.

机构信息

Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):662.e1-662.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.003
PMID:31591049
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

For patients who require self-intermittent catheterization, a continent catheterizable stoma is a viable option. This patient population often has had previous abdominal surgery (PAS), a risk factor for complicated laparoscopic procedures. Therefore, the authors aim to determine whether PAS has an impact on the peri-operative outcomes of the laparoscopic-assisted Mitrofanoff procedure in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A research ethics board-approved retrospective review was performed to assess peri-operative outcomes among pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted Mitrofanoff procedures in the authors institution from May 2000 to March 2016. Patients with no PAS were compared with those with intraperitoneal PAS. Demographic/baseline characteristics and peri-operative outcomes such as operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, unanticipated additional operations, stomal stenosis, and urinary continence were compared. To ensure there is no confounding based on PAS characteristics, subgroups were created to compare the recency (PAS <1 year ago) and extent (ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt vs non-VP shunt PAS) to assess their peri-operative outcomes. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (15 no PAS and 19 PAS) were included in the analysis. No significant difference in demographics and baseline characteristics was noted between the patient groups. The median age was 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.8-14.0) and 9.9 years (4.2-14.3), respectively (NS). Peri-operative outcomes of operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were similar between the PAS and no PAS groups. There was no statistical difference in complications requiring surgical intervention (n = 3, 20.0%; n = 9, 47.4%). The median follow-up period was 25.9 (IQR 7.7-47.2) months and 28.0 (IQR 13.0-53.0) months, respectively (NS). Patients with VP shunts as their only PAS had higher estimated blood loss compared with no PAS group (50 [IQR 25-150], 25 [IQR 25-50], respectively) but without other differences in peri-operative outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Findings support the use of a minimally invasive approach in this patient population as it is feasible, comparable, and safe but with careful consideration for risk factors that may predispose PAS patients to postsurgical complications requiring intervention. Although limited by small sample size, this study provides valuable insight into performing laparoscopic operations in children who have undergone prior surgeries and invites future studies to compare the outcomes between patients undergoing open, pure laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff procedures for children with PAS.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic-assisted Mitrofanoff creation may be safely performed in children with PAS.

摘要

简介和目的

对于需要自我间歇性导尿的患者,可控性膀胱造口术是一种可行的选择。这类患者群体通常有过腹部手术(PAS)史,这是腹腔镜手术复杂的一个危险因素。因此,作者旨在确定 PAS 是否会影响儿童腹腔镜辅助米托法诺夫手术的围手术期结果。

材料和方法

对 2000 年 5 月至 2016 年 3 月在作者所在机构接受腹腔镜辅助米托法诺夫手术的儿科患者进行了研究伦理委员会批准的回顾性研究,以评估围手术期结果。将无 PAS 的患者与有腹腔内 PAS 的患者进行比较。比较了手术时间、估计失血量、住院时间、意外附加手术、造口狭窄和尿控等围手术期结果。为了确保没有基于 PAS 特征的混杂因素,创建了亚组来比较近期(PAS<1 年前)和程度(脑室腹腔分流术(VP)分流与非 VP 分流 PAS),以评估其围手术期结果。Fisher 确切检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验用于确定统计学意义。

结果

34 例患者(无 PAS 15 例,PAS 19 例)纳入分析。两组患者在人口统计学和基线特征方面无显著差异。中位年龄分别为 6.5 岁(四分位距 [IQR] 4.8-14.0)和 9.9 岁(IQR 4.2-14.3)(NS)。PAS 和无 PAS 组的手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间的围手术期结果相似。需要手术干预的并发症无统计学差异(n=3,20.0%;n=9,47.4%)。中位随访时间分别为 25.9(IQR 7.7-47.2)个月和 28.0(IQR 13.0-53.0)个月(NS)。仅 VP 分流术作为唯一 PAS 的患者估计失血量高于无 PAS 组(50[IQR 25-150],25[IQR 25-50]),但围手术期结果无其他差异。

讨论

研究结果支持在该患者群体中采用微创方法,因为它是可行的、可比的和安全的,但需要谨慎考虑可能使 PAS 患者易发生术后并发症需要干预的风险因素。尽管样本量小,但本研究为在既往接受过手术的儿童中进行腹腔镜手术提供了有价值的见解,并邀请未来的研究比较在有 PAS 的儿童中进行开放式、纯腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜米托法诺夫手术的结果。

结论

腹腔镜辅助米托法诺夫手术可安全应用于 PAS 患儿。

相似文献

1
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopy-assisted open appendicovesicostomy (Mitrofanoff) creation in children: a comparative study.既往腹部手术对儿童腹腔镜辅助开放式阑尾-膀胱吻合术(Mitrofanoff)效果的影响:一项对比研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):662.e1-662.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
Laparoscopic-assisted Versus Open Appendicovesicostomy Procedure in Patients With Prior Abdominal Surgeries: A Comparative Study.既往有腹部手术史患者的腹腔镜辅助与开放性阑尾膀胱造口术:一项对比研究。
Urology. 2018 Jun;116:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Augmentation Ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff Appendicovesicostomy in Children: Updated Interim Results.机器人辅助腹腔镜增强回肠膀胱术和米托法诺夫阑尾-膀胱吻合术在儿童中的应用:更新的中期结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
4
A multi-institutional study of perioperative and functional outcomes for pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.一项关于小儿机器人辅助腹腔镜Mitrofanoff阑尾膀胱造瘘术围手术期及功能结局的多机构研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):386.e1-386.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
Laparoscopic Mitrofanoff procedure in children: critical analysis of difficulties and benefits.儿童腹腔镜米氏手术:对困难与益处的批判性分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Feb;11(1):28.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy technique and outcomes of extravesical and intravesical approaches.机器人辅助腹腔镜米托法诺夫阑尾-膀胱吻合术技术及经膀胱外和经膀胱入路的结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):831-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 May 15.
7
Laparoscopic Mitrofanoff continent catheterisable stoma in children with spina bifida.腹腔镜下为脊柱裂患儿构建可控性米氏造口术
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;12(2):126-30. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.160356.
8
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy in children.腹腔镜阑尾-膀胱吻合术治疗儿童的安全性和可行性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Aug;9(4):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
9
Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜米托法诺夫阑尾-膀胱吻合术患者的控尿结局。
J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.050. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
10
Robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: preliminary experience in a pediatric population.机器人辅助腹腔镜米氏法阑尾膀胱造口术:儿科人群的初步经验。
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.055. Epub 2009 Aug 15.