Department of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Pediatric Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Shanghai, China.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Oct 15;15(10):1495-1502. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7984.
To compare the secular trends of sleep/wake patterns in school-aged children in Hong Kong and Shanghai, two major metropolitan cities in China with two different policies that school start time was delayed in Shanghai, but advanced in Hong Kong in 10 years' time.
Participants were from two waves of cross-sectional school-based surveys of children aged 6 to 11 years. In Shanghai, 4,339 and 13,795 children participated in the 2005 and 2014 surveys, respectively. In Hong Kong, 6,231 and 4,585 children participated in the 2003 and 2012 surveys, respectively. Parents reported their children's bedtime and wakeup time, and thus sleep duration, short sleep (≤ 9 hours) and weekend oversleep (difference in sleep duration between weekday and weekend > 2 hours) were determined.
Hong Kong children had later bedtime and wakeup time and slept consistently less than their Shanghai counterparts at both survey time points. The shorter sleep duration was particularly marked during weekdays. Over the interval period, weekday sleep duration significantly decreased from 9.2 to 8.9 hours as wakeup time became earlier for Hong Kong children, but increased from 9.4 to 9.6 hours as wakeup time became later for children in Shanghai. Children from both cities slept longer on the weekends. Prevalence of weekend oversleep significantly increased in Hong Kong children, but no interval change was found in Shanghai children.
The findings indicate subcultural differences in sleep/wake patterns in Shanghai and Hong Kong school-aged children. In particular, sleep duration had increased for Shanghai children, but decreased for Hong Kong children over 10 years. The benefits and barriers of delaying school start time for optimizing sleep health in school-aged children should be further explored.
比较中国两个主要大都市——香港和上海的学龄儿童睡眠/觉醒模式的长期趋势。这两个城市实行了不同的政策,上海推迟了上学时间,而香港则在 10 年内提前了上学时间。
参与者来自于对 6 至 11 岁儿童进行的两次基于学校的横断面调查。在上海,分别有 4339 名和 13795 名儿童参加了 2005 年和 2014 年的调查。在香港,分别有 6231 名和 4585 名儿童参加了 2003 年和 2012 年的调查。家长报告了他们孩子的就寝时间和起床时间,从而确定了睡眠时间、短睡眠(≤9 小时)和周末睡懒觉(工作日和周末之间的睡眠时间差异>2 小时)。
香港儿童的就寝时间和起床时间较晚,在两个调查时间点都比上海儿童的睡眠时间短。短睡眠时间在工作日尤其明显。在间隔期间,由于香港儿童的起床时间提前,工作日的睡眠时间从 9.2 小时显著减少到 8.9 小时,但由于上海儿童的起床时间推迟,睡眠时间从 9.4 小时增加到 9.6 小时。两个城市的儿童周末都睡得更长。香港儿童周末睡懒觉的比例显著增加,但上海儿童没有发现间隔变化。
这些发现表明,上海和香港学龄儿童的睡眠/觉醒模式存在亚文化差异。特别是,上海儿童的睡眠时间增加了,但香港儿童的睡眠时间在 10 年内减少了。推迟上学时间以优化学龄儿童睡眠健康的好处和障碍应进一步探讨。