Suppr超能文献

评估儿科火器和锐器伤的伤害严重程度和资源利用。

Evaluation of Injury Severity and Resource Utilization in Pediatric Firearm and Sharp Force Injuries.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle.

School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912850. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12850.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Pediatric firearm injuries are a serious and growing public health problem, constituting the second leading cause of death in children and adolescents in the United States. Firearm injuries have a high case fatality, but knowledge is limited to date regarding their injury severity and health care utilization burden compared with those of other penetrating injuries, especially among children with critical injury.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare the resource utilization, injury severity, and short-term clinical outcomes associated with pediatric firearm injuries and other penetrating trauma.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Trauma Data Bank, an encounter-level registry of trauma data in the United States, from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. Encounters for firearm injury (n = 25 155) or cut or pierce injury (21 270) in children 17 years or younger were analyzed. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 15, 2018, to June 5, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Firearm injury compared with cut or pierce injury encounters.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS).

RESULTS

A total of 25 155 firearm injury encounters and 21 270 cut or pierce injury encounters were analyzed. Most firearm and cut or pierce injuries occurred among boys (21 573 [85.8%] and 15 864 [74.6%]) and adolescents aged 15 to 17 years (18 807 [74.8%] and 10 895 [51.2%]). A greater proportion of those with firearm injuries were African American children compared with those with cut or pierce injuries (15 019 [61.3%] vs 6397 [31.2%]). A greater proportion of those with firearm injuries compared with cut or pierce injuries were admitted to the ICU (7682 [30.5%] vs 2712 [12.8%]). Compared with cut or pierce injuries, firearm injuries were associated with a higher mean (SD) ISS (4.6 [6.8] vs 10.9 [12.7] points), longer mean (SD) hospital LOS (2.8 [4.1] vs 5.0 [8.4] days), and longer mean (SD) ICU LOS (3.1 [4.5] vs 5.1 [7.7] days). Firearm injuries accounted for 126 027 hospital days and 39 255 ICU days, whereas cut or pierce injuries accounted for 58 705 hospital days and 8353 ICU days. After adjustments for age, sex, year, and hospital, those with firearm injuries were more likely to require ICU admission (relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% CI, 2.1-2.5; P < .001) and to have higher ISS scores (6.7 points higher for all injuries; 95% CI, 6.1-7.2) compared with those with cut or pierce injuries, even among critical injuries. Multinomial logistic regression demonstrated higher risk of prolonged hospital LOS (RR ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 3.46-4.89; P < .001) and ICU LOS (RR ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9-2.3) for firearm injuries compared with cut or pierce injuries.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that pediatric firearm injuries were associated with greater severity and health care utilization compared with penetrating trauma from other mechanisms, suggesting that the mechanism of injury is an important consideration in penetrating sharp force trauma in children and adolescents. Public health measures, legislative efforts, and safe storage practices are among the interventions needed to reduce pediatric firearm injuries.

摘要

重要性

儿科火器伤是一个严重且日益严重的公共卫生问题,是美国儿童和青少年死亡的第二大主要原因。火器伤的病死率很高,但截至目前,与其他穿透性损伤相比,其损伤严重程度和医疗保健利用负担的知识有限,尤其是在严重受伤的儿童中。

目的

描述和比较儿科火器伤和其他穿透性创伤的资源利用、损伤严重程度和短期临床结局。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了美国国家创伤数据库(一个美国创伤数据登记处)的数据,时间范围为 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日。对 17 岁以下儿童的火器伤(n=25155)或切割或刺穿伤(21270)的就诊进行了分析。统计分析于 2018 年 7 月 15 日至 2019 年 6 月 5 日进行。

暴露

火器伤与切割或刺穿伤就诊的比较。

主要结果和测量

重症监护病房(ICU)入院、住院和 ICU 住院时间(LOS)以及损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。

结果

共分析了 25155 例火器伤就诊和 21270 例切割或刺穿伤就诊。大多数火器伤和切割或刺穿伤发生在男孩(21573[85.8%]和 15864[74.6%])和 15 至 17 岁的青少年(18807[74.8%]和 10895[51.2%])。与切割或刺穿伤相比,更多的火器伤患者为非裔美国人儿童(15019[61.3%]比 6397[31.2%])。与切割或刺穿伤相比,更多的火器伤患者需要入住 ICU(7682[30.5%]比 2712[12.8%])。与切割或刺穿伤相比,火器伤的平均(SD)ISS 更高(4.6[6.8]比 10.9[12.7]分),平均(SD)住院 LOS 更长(2.8[4.1]比 5.0[8.4]天),平均(SD)ICU LOS 更长(3.1[4.5]比 5.1[7.7]天)。火器伤导致 126027 天住院和 39255 ICU 天,而切割或刺穿伤导致 58705 天住院和 8353 ICU 天。在调整年龄、性别、年份和医院后,与切割或刺穿伤相比,火器伤患者更有可能需要 ICU 入院(相对风险[RR],2.3;95%置信区间[CI],2.1-2.5;P<.001)和更高的 ISS 评分(所有损伤高 6.7 分;95%CI,6.1-7.2),即使是在严重损伤的情况下也是如此。多项二项逻辑回归显示,与切割或刺穿伤相比,火器伤患者的住院 LOS(RR 比值,4.11;95%CI,3.46-4.89;P<.001)和 ICU LOS(RR 比值,2.2;95%CI,1.9-2.3)的风险更高。

结论和相关性

本研究发现,与其他机制导致的穿透性锐器伤相比,儿科火器伤的严重程度和医疗保健利用程度更高,这表明在儿童和青少年穿透性锐器伤中,损伤机制是一个重要的考虑因素。需要采取公共卫生措施、立法努力和安全储存措施等干预措施来减少儿科火器伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac9/6802232/a3ff5c6486c6/jamanetwopen-2-e1912850-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验