Suppr超能文献

微创及机器人辅助二尖瓣置换术后单侧肺水肿

Unilateral pulmonary oedema after minimally invasive and robotically assisted mitral valve surgery.

作者信息

Kesävuori Risto I, Vento Antti E, Lundbom Nina M I, Iivonen Mikko R M, Huuskonen Antti S, Raivio Peter M

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;57(3):504-511. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz271.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Unilateral pulmonary oedema (UPO) is a severe complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. UPO rates and UPO-related mortality vary considerably between different studies. Due to lack of consistent diagnostic criteria for UPO, the aim of this study was to create a reproducible radiological classification for UPO. Also, risk factors for UPO after robotic and minimally invasive mitral valve operations were evaluated.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-one patients who underwent elective minimally invasive mitral valve surgery between January 2009 and March 2017 were evaluated. Chest radiographs of the first postoperative morning were categorized into 3 UPO grades based on the severity of radiological signs of pulmonary oedema described in this study. The radiographs were analysed by 2 independent radiologists and interobserver agreement was evaluated. The clinical significance of the classification was evaluated by comparing postoperative PaO2/FiO2 values and total ventilation times between the different UPO grades. Also, multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for UPO.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was substantial (Kappa = 0.780). Median total ventilation times were significantly longer with increasing severity of UPO, 15 (interquartile range 12-18) h for no UPO, 18 (interquartile range 15-24) h for grade I UPO and 25 (interquartile range 21-31) h for grade II UPO. Pulmonary hypertension [adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 2.51, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.43-4.40; P = 0.001], moderate or severe heart failure (AOR 2.88, 95% CI 1.27-6.53; P = 0.011), body mass index (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28; P = 0.017) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (AOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for UPO and robotic approach (AOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.62; P = 0.002) as protective against UPO.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the variability of the diagnostic criteria for UPO in previous studies, a radiological classification for UPO is required to reliably assess the rates and risk factors for UPO. The radiological classification described in this study demonstrated high interobserver agreement and correlated with total ventilation times and postoperative PaO2/FiO2 values.

摘要

目的

单侧肺水肿(UPO)是微创心脏手术的一种严重并发症。不同研究之间UPO的发生率和与UPO相关的死亡率差异很大。由于缺乏UPO一致的诊断标准,本研究的目的是创建一种可重复的UPO放射学分类方法。此外,还评估了机器人辅助和微创二尖瓣手术后发生UPO的危险因素。

方法

对2009年1月至2017年3月期间接受择期微创二尖瓣手术的231例患者进行评估。根据本研究中描述的肺水肿放射学征象的严重程度,将术后第一个早晨的胸部X光片分为3个UPO等级。由2名独立的放射科医生对X光片进行分析,并评估观察者间的一致性。通过比较不同UPO等级之间的术后PaO2/FiO2值和总通气时间,评估该分类的临床意义。此外,采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定UPO的危险因素。

结果

观察者间的一致性较高(Kappa = 0.780)。随着UPO严重程度的增加,总通气时间的中位数显著延长,无UPO患者为15(四分位间距12 - 18)小时,I级UPO患者为18(四分位间距15 - 24)小时,II级UPO患者为25(四分位间距21 - 31)小时。肺动脉高压[调整后的优势比(AOR)2.51,95%置信区间(CI)1.43 - 4.40;P = 0.001]、中度或重度心力衰竭(AOR 2.88,95% CI 1.27 - 6.53;P = 0.011)、体重指数(AOR 1.14,95% CI 1.02 - 1.28;P = 0.017)和体外循环时间(AOR 1.02,95% CI 1.01 - 1.03;P < 0.001)被确定为UPO的独立危险因素,而机器人手术方式(AOR 0.27,95% CI 0.12 - 0.62;P = 0.002)对UPO有保护作用。

结论

由于既往研究中UPO诊断标准的变异性,需要一种UPO放射学分类方法来可靠地评估UPO的发生率和危险因素。本研究中描述的放射学分类显示出较高的观察者间一致性,并与总通气时间和术后PaO2/FiO2值相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验