Suppr超能文献

超声评估踝关节骨折三角韧带完整性。

Ultrasonographic Assessment of Deltoid Ligament Integrity in Ankle Fractures.

机构信息

Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal.

NOVA Medical School/Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Feb;41(2):147-153. doi: 10.1177/1071100719882679. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regardless of fibular status, the presence of a superficial deltoid ligament disruption or a combination of deep and superficial deltoid ligament disruption is central to the decision-making process in treating ankle fractures. The aims of the present study were to test whether ultrasonography can assess deltoid ligament integrity and to determine its validity and reliability by comparing it with gravity stress radiography.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 81 eligible patients with a nondisplaced or minimally displaced fibula fracture identified on a standard radiograph were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent gravity stress radiography and ultrasonography. Image analysis included the layer type, integrity, and tear site of the deltoid ligament. Ultrasound validity and intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed by the interpretations of the first author and an independent observer who were blinded to the results.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 64 (79.0%) had a deltoid ligament disruption; most of the tears were of both the superficial and deep layers, partial and proximal attachment tears, and only 8 (12.5%) were complete tears. Patients with an intact deltoid ligament had a mean medial clear space (MCS) value of 2.7 ± 0.5 mm, and those with deltoid ligament tears had a mean MCS value of 5.9 ± 3.4 mm ( < .001). In a comparison between ultrasonography and gravity radiography, we found a sensitivity of 100% versus 97%, a specificity of 90% versus 100%, a positive predictive value of 97% versus 100%, and a negative predictive value of 100% versus 90%, respectively. The intra- and interobserver reliability was evaluated as almost perfect in all conditions. In a comparison between ultrasonography and gravity radiography, we found a sensitivity of 100% versus 97%, a specificity of 90% versus 100%, a positive predictive value of 97% versus 100%, and a negative predictive value of 100% versus 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography proved to be an accurate tool, allowing the identification of deltoid ligament disruption and the involved components in a more dynamic fashion. Its relative ease of use and lack of ionizing radiation make it a useful and confident technique that can be performed by an orthopedist.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

摘要

背景

无论腓骨状况如何,对于治疗踝关节骨折,存在浅层三角韧带撕裂或深层和浅层三角韧带联合撕裂,是决策过程中的关键。本研究旨在通过与重力应力放射摄影术比较,检测超声是否可以评估三角韧带完整性,并确定其有效性和可靠性。

方法

连续纳入 81 例标准 X 线片显示非移位或轻度移位腓骨骨折的患者,前瞻性研究。所有患者均行重力应力放射摄影术和超声检查。图像分析包括三角韧带的层型、完整性和撕裂部位。超声的有效性和观察者内及观察者间的可靠性通过第一作者和一位独立观察者的解读来评估,该观察者对结果不知情。

结果

所有患者中,64 例(79.0%)存在三角韧带撕裂;大多数撕裂为浅层和深层、部分和近端附着撕裂,仅有 8 例(12.5%)为完全撕裂。三角韧带完整的患者内侧间隙(MCS)平均值为 2.7 ± 0.5mm,三角韧带撕裂的患者 MCS 平均值为 5.9 ± 3.4mm(<0.001)。在超声与重力放射摄影术的比较中,我们发现超声的灵敏度为 100%对 97%,特异性为 90%对 100%,阳性预测值为 97%对 100%,阴性预测值为 100%对 90%。在所有情况下,观察者内和观察者间的可靠性均评估为几乎完美。在超声与重力放射摄影术的比较中,我们发现超声的灵敏度为 100%对 97%,特异性为 90%对 100%,阳性预测值为 97%对 100%,阴性预测值为 100%对 90%。

结论

超声检查被证明是一种准确的工具,可更动态地识别三角韧带撕裂及涉及的成分。其使用相对简单且无电离辐射,使其成为一种有用且可靠的技术,可由骨科医生操作。

证据等级

II 级,前瞻性比较研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验