Ayyaswamy Brijesh, Saeed Bilal, Anand Anoop, Chan Lai, Shetty Vishwanath
Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK.
Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Sep 3;4(9):533-540. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190008. eCollection 2019 Sep.
The majority of included studies (8 out of 11, = 54) supported the concept of considering amputation for selected, unresponsive cases of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) as a justifiable alternative to an unsuccessful multimodality nonoperative option.Of patients who underwent amputation, 66% experienced improvement in quality of life (QOL) and 37% were able to use a prosthesis, 16% had an obvious decline in QOL and for 12% of patients, no clear details were given, although it was suggested by authors that these patients also encountered deterioration after amputation.Complications of phantom limb pain, recurrence of CRPS and stump pain were predominant risks and were noticed in 65%, 45% and 30% of cases after amputation, respectively and two-thirds of patients were satisfied.Amputation can be considered by clinicians and patients as an option to improve QOL and to relieve agonizing, excruciating pain of severe, resistant CRPS at a specialized centre after multidisclipinary involvement but it must be acknowledged that evidence is limited, and the there are risks of aggravating or recurrence of CRPS, phantom pain and unpredictable consequences of rehabilitation.Amputation, if considered for resistant CRPS, should be carried out at specialist centres and after MDT involvement before and after surgery. It should only be considered if requested by patients with poor quality of life who have failed to improve after multiple treatment modalities.Further high quality and comprehensive research is needed to understand the severe form of CRPS which behaves differently form less severe stages. Cite this article: 2019;4:533-540. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190008.
大多数纳入研究(11项中的8项,n = 54)支持这样一种观点,即对于某些选定的、对复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)无反应的病例,截肢可作为多模式非手术治疗失败后的合理替代方案。在接受截肢的患者中,66%的患者生活质量(QOL)有所改善,37%的患者能够使用假肢,16%的患者生活质量明显下降,12%的患者未给出明确细节,不过作者指出这些患者截肢后也出现了恶化情况。幻肢痛、CRPS复发和残端痛是主要并发症,截肢后分别有65%、45%和30%的病例出现这些并发症,三分之二的患者表示满意。临床医生和患者可以将截肢视为一种选择,以改善生活质量,并在多学科参与后,在专业中心缓解严重、难治性CRPS的剧痛,但必须承认证据有限,而且存在CRPS加重或复发、幻肢痛以及康复后果不可预测的风险。如果考虑对难治性CRPS进行截肢,应在专科中心进行,且手术前后都要有多学科团队参与。只有在生活质量较差、经过多种治疗方式均未改善的患者提出要求时,才应考虑截肢。需要进一步开展高质量、全面的研究,以了解严重形式的CRPS,其表现与较轻阶段有所不同。引用本文:2019;4:533 - 540。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.4.190008。