Suppr超能文献

学术倡导:在美国游说法下影响健康和科学政策的机会。

Academic Advocacy: Opportunities to Influence Health and Science Policy Under U.S. Lobbying Law.

机构信息

H. Fernandez Lynch is John Russell Dickson, MD Presidential Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A. Bateman-House is assistant professor, Division of Medical Ethics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. S.M. Rivera is vice president for research, Office of Research and Technology Management, and associate professor, Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2020 Jan;95(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003037.

Abstract

Medical school faculty and their colleagues in schools of nursing, public health, social work, and elsewhere often research issues of critical importance to health and science policy. When academics engage with government policymakers to advocate for change based on their research, however, they may find themselves engaged in "lobbying," thereby entering a complex environment of legal requirements and institutional policies that they may not fully understand. To promote academic advocacy, this article explains what is and is not legally permitted when it comes to engaging with policymakers and encourages academic institutions to facilitate permissible advocacy activities.U.S. law permits academic researchers to conduct certain types of policy-focused advocacy without running afoul of legal restrictions on lobbying. Academics acting in their personal capacities and with their own resources may freely engage with policymakers in any branch of government to provide their expertise and advocate for desired outcomes. When acting in their professional capacities, academics are free to engage in most advocacy activities directed to the executive and judicial branches, and they also may advocate to influence legislation and legislators within certain limits that are particularly relevant to academic work. In all cases, academics must take care to not use restricted funds for lobbying.Academic researchers have an important role to play in advancing evidence-based health and science policy. They should familiarize themselves with legal restrictions and opportunities to influence policy based on their research, and their institutions should actively support them in doing so.

摘要

医学院校的教职员工及其在护理、公共卫生、社会工作等学校的同事经常研究对健康和科学政策至关重要的问题。然而,当学者们根据自己的研究与政府政策制定者合作倡导变革时,他们可能会发现自己参与了“游说”,从而进入了一个他们可能不完全理解的法律要求和机构政策的复杂环境。为了促进学术倡导,本文解释了当涉及与政策制定者接触时,什么是合法的,什么是不合法的,并鼓励学术机构为允许的倡导活动提供便利。

美国法律允许学术研究人员进行某些类型的以政策为重点的倡导活动,而不会违反对游说的法律限制。以个人身份并利用自己的资源行事的学者可以自由地与政府的任何分支机构的政策制定者接触,提供他们的专业知识并倡导期望的结果。以专业身份行事时,学者可以自由地参与大多数针对行政和司法部门的倡导活动,并且他们也可以在某些特别与学术工作相关的限制内倡导影响立法和立法者。在所有情况下,学者必须注意不要将受限制的资金用于游说。

学术研究人员在推进基于证据的健康和科学政策方面发挥着重要作用。他们应该熟悉法律限制和根据自己的研究影响政策的机会,并应积极支持他们这样做。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验