Suppr超能文献

心脏导管插入术和冠状动脉介入治疗的镇静与镇痛。

Sedation and Analgesia for Cardiac Catheterisation and Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Department of Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Feb;29(2):169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While cardiac catheterisation is typically well tolerated, discomfort and anxiety are commonplace. Sedation using anxiolytic and analgesic medications has the potential to ameliorate such symptoms, however, is variably employed, with lack of standardised regimens and limited evidence.

METHODS

We performed a review of the role of sedation for cardiac catheterisation, including current practices and summarising available evidence relevant to diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory.

RESULTS

Use of sedation and the medication regimens employed are highly variable. Available relevant studies are limited in number and mostly small. Sedation appears to modestly reduce anxiety and pain in most studies. The incidence of radial spasm and the consequent need to alter access site is reduced with procedural sedation. The majority of existing evidence applies to benzodiazepines and opioid use, which appear acceptably efficacious and safe when used with appropriate training and staffing; noting opioid medications reduce the absorption of loading doses of oral anti-platelet drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, benzodiazepines and opioids result a modest reduction in pain, improved patient tolerability and reduced risk of radial artery spasm. The decision on whether to use sedation, and which agent(s) and dose, should be individualised based on patient factors, including need for oral antiplatelet therapy administration. Appropriate staffing and monitoring is essential.

摘要

背景

虽然心脏导管插入术通常能被很好地耐受,但不适感和焦虑感却很常见。使用镇静和镇痛药物进行镇静有可能改善这些症状,但镇静的应用方式存在差异,缺乏标准化方案,且证据有限。

方法

我们对心脏导管插入术镇静的作用进行了综述,包括当前的实践,并总结了与心脏导管插入术实验室中诊断和介入性冠状动脉程序相关的现有证据。

结果

镇静的使用和所使用的药物方案高度可变。现有相关研究数量有限且大多规模较小。镇静在大多数研究中似乎能适度减轻焦虑和疼痛。与有创镇静相比,桡动脉痉挛的发生率及其改变入路的需要减少。大多数现有证据适用于苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物的使用,这些药物在接受适当培训和人员配备时具有可接受的疗效和安全性;需要注意的是,阿片类药物会降低口服抗血小板药物负荷剂量的吸收。

结论

总之,苯二氮䓬类药物和阿片类药物可适度减轻疼痛,提高患者耐受性,降低桡动脉痉挛的风险。是否使用镇静以及使用哪种药物和剂量应根据患者因素个体化决定,包括是否需要给予口服抗血小板治疗。适当的人员配备和监测至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验