Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia.
ISEM, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Heredity (Edinb). 2020 Feb;124(2):313-324. doi: 10.1038/s41437-019-0274-3. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
In modern societies, there is a decreased usage of traditional weapons to settle interpersonal or inter-group disputes compared to usage in traditional societies, possibly affecting the frequency-dependent selection on the handedness polymorphism. Another societal difference is the extensive automation of hard manual labour (including agriculture) in industrialized societies, relaxing the selection for hand specialization. Thus, selection of handedness is likely to differ between traditional and modern societies. As heritability determines the relative speed of evolutionary dynamics, handedness heritability was compared between industrialized and non-industrialized societies. First, individuals were sampled from a non-industrialized area in Indonesia, where violent conflicts are relatively frequent and tribal wars have been prevalent recently. Handedness was recorded directly or indirectly for 11,490 individuals belonging to 650 independent pedigrees, and handedness heritability was estimated using a pedigree-based animal model. Second, estimates of handedness heritability derived from published sources were collected to compare heritability estimates, accounting for various confounding variables. Non-industrialized countries displayed a significantly higher heritability value (h = 0.56) than that of industrialized countries (h = 0.20). Heritability decreased with time along the twentieth century in industrialized countries, independently of the frequency of left-handedness, and independently of the method used to measure handedness. In conclusion, the data are consistent with a decrease in handedness heritability following the industrialization process and/or the associated decrease in violence using traditional weapons. The difference in heritability between industrialized and non-industrialized countries suggests that selection of handedness is thus likely to differ between traditional and modern societies.
在现代社会中,与传统社会相比,人们在解决人际或群体争端时较少使用传统武器,这可能会影响对手性多态性的频率依赖选择。另一个社会差异是工业化社会中硬体力劳动(包括农业)的广泛自动化,这放松了对手专业化的选择。因此,传统社会和现代社会对手性的选择可能不同。由于遗传力决定了进化动态的相对速度,因此比较了工业化和非工业化社会之间的手性遗传力。首先,从印度尼西亚的一个非工业化地区抽取个体,那里暴力冲突相对频繁,部落战争最近一直很普遍。直接或间接记录了属于 650 个独立谱系的 11490 个人的手性,并使用基于谱系的动物模型估计了手性遗传力。其次,从已发表的来源中收集了手性遗传力的估计值,以比较遗传力估计值,同时考虑了各种混杂变量。非工业化国家的遗传力值(h=0.56)明显高于工业化国家(h=0.20)。在工业化国家中,遗传力随着时间的推移而降低,与惯用左手的频率无关,也与测量手性的方法无关。总之,这些数据与工业化过程中手性遗传力的下降以及使用传统武器的暴力行为的下降一致。工业化国家和非工业化国家之间遗传力的差异表明,手性的选择在传统社会和现代社会之间可能不同。