Suppr超能文献

在接受脊髓手术的患者中,与恒流刺激相比,恒压刺激下大脑电刺激引起的肌肉诱发电位受麻醉消退的影响更小。

Muscle-evoked Potentials After Electrical Stimulation to the Brain in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery are Less Affected by Anesthetic Fade With Constant-voltage Stimulation Than With Constant-current Stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

Department of Anesthesia, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Nov 1;44(21):1492-1498. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003166.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, within-subject study was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the influence of anesthetic fade under maximum stimulation conditions between constant-current and constant-voltage stimulation techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The monitoring of muscle-evoked potentials after electrical stimulation to the brain [Br(E)-MSEP)] is useful for assessing the integrity of spinal cord motor tracts during major spine surgery. Nonetheless, Br(E)-MSEP responses are known to deteriorate over the duration of surgeries performed under general anesthesia. This phenomenon is known as anesthetic fade.

METHODS

We recruited 117 patients undergoing various spinal surgeries from the cervical to the lumbar level. We excluded 29 cases with insufficient data. The decrease rate of the Br(E)-MSEP amplitude for each muscle was examined. Br(E)-MSEP monitoring with constant-current and constant-voltage stimulations at the C3 and C4 electrode positions was applied. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were bilaterally recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, deltoid, abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps muscles. We defined the decrease rate as follows: (initial CMAPs-final CMAPs)/initial CMAPs × 100. Differences in the decrease rate were evaluated between stimulators, limbs (upper vs. lower), and operative time group (lowest quartile vs. highest quartile).

RESULTS

The overall decrease rate (across all muscles) increased as the operative time increased, and the rate was higher in the lower limbs than in the upper limbs. In addition, the overall decrease rate was lower with constant-voltage stimulation than with constant-current stimulation. Furthermore, the decrease rate for constant-current stimulation was significantly higher than that for constant-voltage stimulation, regardless of the operative time.

CONCLUSION

The CMAP waveform with constant-voltage stimulation is less susceptible to anesthetic fade than that with constant-current stimulation, even during long surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

进行了一项前瞻性、自身对照研究。

目的

旨在比较在最大刺激条件下,恒流刺激和恒压刺激技术对麻醉消退的影响。

背景资料概要

脑电刺激后肌诱发电位(Br(E)-MSEP)监测在评估重大脊柱手术期间脊髓运动束的完整性方面是有用的。然而,已知 Br(E)-MSEP 反应会在全身麻醉下进行的手术过程中随着时间的推移而恶化。这种现象称为麻醉消退。

方法

我们招募了 117 名接受从颈椎到腰椎各种脊柱手术的患者。我们排除了 29 例数据不足的病例。检查了每个肌肉的 Br(E)-MSEP 幅度的下降率。在 C3 和 C4 电极位置应用恒流和恒压刺激进行 Br(E)-MSEP 监测。从拇短展肌、三角肌、踇长展肌、胫骨前肌、腓肠肌和股四头肌双侧记录复合肌肉动作电位(CMAPs)。我们将下降率定义为:(初始 CMAPs-最终 CMAPs)/初始 CMAPs×100。评估刺激器、肢体(上肢与下肢)和手术时间组(最低四分位数与最高四分位数)之间下降率的差异。

结果

总体下降率(所有肌肉)随着手术时间的增加而增加,下肢的下降率高于上肢。此外,恒压刺激的总体下降率低于恒流刺激。此外,无论手术时间如何,恒流刺激的下降率都明显高于恒压刺激。

结论

即使在长时间手术中,恒压刺激的 CMAP 波形也比恒流刺激更不易受到麻醉消退的影响。

证据水平

3 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验