• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童面部重建中颞肌延长肌成形术与游离股薄肌移植术的比较

Comparison of Lengthening Temporalis Myoplasty and Free-Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Facial Reanimation in Children.

作者信息

Nguyen Phuong D, Faschan Kristin S, Mazzaferro Daniel M, Konieczny Tami, Jackson Oksana A, Bartlett Scott P

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;31(1):85-90. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005885.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005885
PMID:31609948
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lengthening temporalis myoplasty (LTM) and cross-face nerve graft with free gracilis muscle transfer (CFNG-FGMT) are the 2 most common procedures used to restore dynamic facial animation and improve facial symmetry. There has not been direct comparison or consensus. Here, the authors compare our experience with respect to muscle activity, symmetry, and excursion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients with facial palsy who had CFNG-FGMT or LTM from 2008 to 2016 at a single institution. Postoperative surface EMG was recorded at maximum open smile. Normal and paralyzed sides of the face were analyzed with Facial Assessment by Computer Evaluation software. Commissure excursion and symmetry was assessed.

RESULTS

Six patients with LTM and 10 with CFNG-FGMT met inclusion criteria. Muscle activity was 1st identified in LTM patients after 3 months (47.42 mV, P < 0.001) and CFNG-FGMT patients after 3 months (28.30 mV, P < 0.001) compared to immediate postoperative period. Relative to preoperative excursion, there was significant increase of 3.33 mm in commissure excursion seen at the 0 to 3 month period for LTM patients (P = 0.04). Commisure excursion for CFNG-FGMT was seen later, in the 3- to 6-month postoperative period (4.01, P = 0.024). During smile, CFNG-FGMT patients had better symmetry than unilateral LTM patients. In bilateral LTM patients, there was no significant change in symmetry.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic facial animation improved in both surgical groups. The LTM demonstrates a faster rate of muscle recruitment compared to CFNG-FGMT. After 3 months, both LTM and CFNG-FGMT groups had comparable excursions. A decision-making algorithm is presented.

摘要

背景

延长颞肌肌成形术(LTM)和带游离股薄肌转移的跨面神经移植术(CFNG - FGMT)是用于恢复面部动态表情和改善面部对称性的两种最常见手术。目前尚无直接比较或达成共识。在此,作者比较了我们在肌肉活动、对称性和移位方面的经验。

方法

对2008年至2016年在单一机构接受CFNG - FGMT或LTM治疗的面瘫患者进行回顾性研究。在最大程度露齿笑时记录术后表面肌电图。使用计算机评估软件对面部的正常侧和瘫痪侧进行分析。评估口角移位和对称性。

结果

6例接受LTM手术和10例接受CFNG - FGMT手术的患者符合纳入标准。与术后即刻相比,LTM患者在3个月后首次出现肌肉活动(47.42 mV,P < 0.001),CFNG - FGMT患者在3个月后出现肌肉活动(28.30 mV,P < 0.001)。相对于术前移位,LTM患者在0至3个月期间口角移位显著增加3.33 mm(P = 0.04)。CFNG - FGMT的口角移位出现较晚,在术后3至6个月(4.01,P = 0.024)。在微笑时,CFNG - FGMT患者的对称性优于单侧LTM患者。在双侧LTM患者中,对称性无显著变化。

结论

两个手术组的面部动态表情均有改善。与CFNG - FGMT相比,LTM显示出更快的肌肉募集速度。3个月后,LTM和CFNG - FGMT组的移位情况相当。本文提出了一种决策算法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Lengthening Temporalis Myoplasty and Free-Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Facial Reanimation in Children.儿童面部重建中颞肌延长肌成形术与游离股薄肌移植术的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;31(1):85-90. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005885.
2
Comparative Study of 2 Different Innervation Techniques in Facial Reanimation: Cross-face Nerve Graft-Innervated Versus Double-Innervated Free Gracilis Muscle Transfer.两种不同神经支配技术对面部再神经支配的对比研究:跨面神经移植与双神经支配游离股薄肌移植的比较。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;84(2):188-195. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002034.
3
Early Outcomes in an Emerging Facial Nerve Center: The Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Experience.新兴面神经中心的早期结果:俄勒冈健康与科学大学(OHSU)的经验。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 May;130(5):459-466. doi: 10.1177/0003489420957371. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Free Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Smile Reanimation in Children.游离股薄肌移植用于儿童微笑再神经支配的长期疗效。
J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;202:279-284.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.043. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
5
Quality-of-life improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer for smile restoration in patients with facial paralysis.游离股薄肌移植修复面瘫患者笑容后生活质量的改善
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):419-24. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.679.
6
Donor nerve selection in free gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.游离股薄肌移植用于面部再神经支配的供体神经选择:临床结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Jul;82:31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
7
Dual-Innervated Free Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Facial Reanimation in Children.双神经化游离股薄肌肌皮瓣移植在儿童面瘫中的应用
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Nov 1;89(5):538-542. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003287. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
8
The Tinel Sign and Myelinated Axons in the Cross-Face Nerve Graft: Predictors of Smile Reanimation Outcome for Free Gracilis Muscle Transfer?跨面神经移植中 Tinel 征与有髓轴突:自由股薄肌移植后面部运动恢复结果的预测指标?
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;24(4):255-259. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0207. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Lengthening temporalis myoplasty versus free muscle transfer with the gracilis flap for long-standing facial paralysis: A systematic review of outcomes.颞肌延长肌成形术与股薄肌瓣游离肌肉移植治疗长期面瘫的疗效系统评价
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;44(8):940-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 25.
10
Age-related outcome of facial reanimation surgery using cross face nerve graft and gracilis free functional muscle transfer-A retrospective cohort study.使用跨面神经移植和股薄肌游离功能性肌肉转移进行面部重建手术的年龄相关结果——一项回顾性队列研究
Microsurgery. 2022 Sep;42(6):557-567. doi: 10.1002/micr.30896. Epub 2022 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of temporalis muscle-based facial reanimation surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于颞肌的面部重建手术的结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JPRAS Open. 2024 Nov 1;43:105-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.015. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Masseter nerve-based facial palsy reconstruction.基于咬肌神经的面神经麻痹重建。
Arch Craniofac Surg. 2020 Dec;21(6):337-344. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2020.00682. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
3
Pediatric facial reanimation: An algorithmic approach and systematic review.小儿面部再植术:一种算法方法及系统评价。
Arch Plast Surg. 2020 Sep;47(5):382-391. doi: 10.5999/aps.2020.00710. Epub 2020 Sep 15.