Suppr超能文献

新兴面神经中心的早期结果:俄勒冈健康与科学大学(OHSU)的经验。

Early Outcomes in an Emerging Facial Nerve Center: The Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) Experience.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 May;130(5):459-466. doi: 10.1177/0003489420957371. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Nerve transfer (NT) and free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) are procedures for reanimation of the paralyzed face. Assessing the surgical outcomes of these procedures is imperative when evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions, especially when establishing a new center focused on the treatment of patients with facial paralysis. We desired to discuss the factors to consider when implementing a facial nerve center and the means by which the specialist can assess and analyze outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with facial palsy secondary to multiple etiologies, including cerebellopontine angle tumors, head and neck carcinoma, and trauma, who underwent NT or FGMT between 2014 and 2019 were included. Primary outcomes were facial symmetry and smile excursion, calculated using FACE-gram and Emotrics software. Subjective quality of life outcomes, including the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale and Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ), were also assessed.

RESULTS

14/22 NT and 6/6 FGMT patients met inclusion criteria having both pre-and postoperative photo documentation. NT increased oral commissure excursion from 0.4 mm (SD 5.3) to 2.9 mm (SD 6.8) ( = 0.05), and improved symmetry of excursion ( < 0.001) and angle ( < 0.001). FGMT increased oral commissure excursion from -1.4 mm (SD 3.9) to 2.1 mm (SD 3.7), ( = 0.02), and improved symmetry of excursion ( < 0.001). FaCE scores improved in NT patients postoperatively ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring outcomes, critical analyses, and a multidisciplinary approach are necessary components when building a facial nerve center. At our emerging facial nerve center, we found NT and FGMT procedures improved smile excursion and symmetry, and improved QOL following NT in patients with facial palsy secondary to multiple etiologies.

摘要

目的

神经转移(NT)和游离股薄肌转移(FGMT)是用于瘫痪面部再运动的程序。在评估这些干预措施的有效性时,评估这些程序的手术结果至关重要,特别是在建立一个专注于治疗面瘫患者的新中心时。我们希望讨论实施面神经中心时需要考虑的因素,以及专家评估和分析结果的方法。

方法

纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年间因多种病因(包括桥小脑角肿瘤、头颈部癌和创伤)导致面瘫而接受 NT 或 FGMT 的患者。主要结果是使用 FACE-gram 和 Emotrics 软件计算的面部对称性和微笑幅度。还评估了主观生活质量结果,包括面部临床计量评估(FaCE)量表和联带运动评估问卷(SAQ)。

结果

14/22 例 NT 和 6/6 例 FGMT 患者符合纳入标准,均有术前和术后照片记录。NT 增加了口角位移从 0.4mm(SD 5.3)到 2.9mm(SD 6.8)( = 0.05),并改善了位移( < 0.001)和角度( < 0.001)的对称性。FGMT 增加了口角位移从-1.4mm(SD 3.9)到 2.1mm(SD 3.7),( = 0.02),并改善了位移( < 0.001)的对称性。NT 患者术后 FaCE 评分提高( < 0.001)。

结论

在建立面神经中心时,测量结果、关键分析和多学科方法是必要的组成部分。在我们新兴的面神经中心,我们发现 NT 和 FGMT 程序改善了微笑幅度和对称性,并且改善了多种病因导致面瘫患者的生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验