Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
J Virol. 2019 Dec 12;94(1). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00841-19.
Type I interferons (IFNs) are key mediators of the innate immune response. Although members of this family of cytokines signal through a single shared receptor, biochemical and functional variation exists in response to different IFN subtypes. While previous work has demonstrated that type I IFNs are essential to control infection by chikungunya virus (CHIKV), a globally emerging alphavirus, the contributions of individual IFN subtypes remain undefined. To address this question, we evaluated CHIKV pathogenesis in mice lacking IFN-β (IFN-β knockout [IFN-β-KO] mice or mice treated with an IFN-β-blocking antibody) or IFN-α (IFN regulatory factor 7 knockout [IRF7-KO] mice or mice treated with a pan-IFN-α-blocking antibody). Mice lacking either IFN-α or IFN-β developed severe clinical disease following infection with CHIKV, with a marked increase in foot swelling compared to wild-type mice. Virological analysis revealed that mice lacking IFN-α sustained elevated infection in the infected ankle and in distant tissues. In contrast, IFN-β-KO mice displayed minimal differences in viral burdens within the ankle or at distal sites and instead had an altered cellular immune response. Mice lacking IFN-β had increased neutrophil infiltration into musculoskeletal tissues, and depletion of neutrophils in IFN-β-KO but not IRF7-KO mice mitigated musculoskeletal disease caused by CHIKV. Our findings suggest disparate roles for the IFN subtypes during CHIKV infection, with IFN-α limiting early viral replication and dissemination and IFN-β modulating neutrophil-mediated inflammation. Type I interferons (IFNs) possess a range of biological activity and protect against a number of viruses, including alphaviruses. Despite signaling through a shared receptor, there are established biochemical and functional differences among the IFN subtypes. The significance of our research is in demonstrating that IFN-α and IFN-β both have protective roles during acute chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection but do so by distinct mechanisms. IFN-α limits CHIKV replication and dissemination, whereas IFN-β protects from CHIKV pathogenesis by limiting inflammation mediated by neutrophils. Our findings support the premise that the IFN subtypes have distinct biological activities in the antiviral response.
I 型干扰素(IFNs)是先天免疫反应的关键介质。尽管这个细胞因子家族的成员通过单个共享受体信号传导,但对不同 IFN 亚型的反应存在生化和功能差异。虽然之前的工作已经证明 I 型 IFNs 对于控制基孔肯雅病毒(CHIKV)的感染至关重要,但个别 IFN 亚型的贡献仍未确定。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了缺乏 IFN-β(IFN-β 敲除[IFN-β-KO]小鼠或用 IFN-β 阻断抗体处理的小鼠)或 IFN-α(IRF7 敲除[IRF7-KO]小鼠或用泛 IFN-α 阻断抗体处理的小鼠)的 CHIKV 发病机制。感染 CHIKV 后,缺乏 IFN-α 或 IFN-β 的小鼠会出现严重的临床疾病,与野生型小鼠相比,足部肿胀明显增加。病毒学分析显示,缺乏 IFN-α 的小鼠在感染的踝关节和远处组织中持续存在高感染。相比之下,IFN-β-KO 小鼠在踝关节或远端部位的病毒载量差异最小,而是表现出改变的细胞免疫反应。缺乏 IFN-β 的小鼠肌肉骨骼组织中的中性粒细胞浸润增加,IFN-β-KO 而不是 IRF7-KO 小鼠中的中性粒细胞耗竭减轻了 CHIKV 引起的肌肉骨骼疾病。我们的研究结果表明,IFN 亚型在 CHIKV 感染过程中发挥不同的作用,IFN-α 限制早期病毒复制和传播,IFN-β 调节中性粒细胞介导的炎症。I 型干扰素(IFNs)具有多种生物学活性,可以抵抗多种病毒,包括甲病毒。尽管通过共享受体信号传导,但 IFN 亚型之间存在已建立的生化和功能差异。我们研究的意义在于证明 IFN-α 和 IFN-β 在急性基孔肯雅病毒(CHIKV)感染期间都具有保护作用,但通过不同的机制。IFN-α 限制 CHIKV 的复制和传播,而 IFN-β 通过限制中性粒细胞介导的炎症来保护免受 CHIKV 发病机制的影响。我们的研究结果支持这样一个前提,即 IFN 亚型在抗病毒反应中具有不同的生物学活性。