Jolly Jasleen K, Bridge Holly, MacLaren Robert E
Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Wellcome Integrative Neuroimaging Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 18;10:1076. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01076. eCollection 2019.
Multiple gene therapy trials are occurring for a variety of ophthalmic diseases around the world. The safety of gene therapy in the eye has been established, and the next step is to reliably assess efficacy. This is primarily done through the use of imaging techniques and visual function measures. Standardized visual function assessments, however, were originally developed for a clinical setting and may not be suitable for detecting and quantifying therapeutic changes. This scoping review takes a comprehensive look at current practice in terms of the outcome measures defined at trial registration. These were compared to the outcome measures reported in the literature. All published trials reported the pre-registered primary outcome measure. A range of additional secondary outcomes were reported that were not originally planned. Gaps in gene therapy assessment exist and further discussion are required to find a way forward, particularly as more conditions progress to phase 2 and 3 trials. Several factors impacting on trial design and outcome measure choice are discussed.
世界各地正在针对多种眼科疾病开展多项基因治疗试验。基因治疗在眼部的安全性已经确立,下一步是可靠地评估疗效。这主要通过使用成像技术和视觉功能测量来完成。然而,标准化的视觉功能评估最初是为临床环境开发的,可能不适用于检测和量化治疗变化。本综述全面审视了试验注册时定义的结局指标方面的当前实践。将这些指标与文献中报道的结局指标进行了比较。所有已发表的试验都报告了预先注册的主要结局指标。还报告了一系列最初未计划的额外次要结局。基因治疗评估存在差距,需要进一步讨论以找到前进的方向,特别是随着更多病症进入2期和3期试验。讨论了影响试验设计和结局指标选择的几个因素。