Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ministry of Health Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ministry of Health Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Oct 18;14(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0657-3.
According to the literature, only 20-30% of patients are screened for osteoporosis after a hip fracture. Osteoporosis treatment may have a potential protective effect on the 5-year mortality rate. Our results demonstrated that 5-year survival is higher in patients who received osteoporosis treatment after hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture compared with those who did not.
This study aims to investigate the status of osteoporosis treatment in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for an osteoporotic hip fracture and to compare subsequent fractures and the 5-year survival rates of these patients with those who did not receive the osteoporosis treatment.
Patients > 65 years of age who underwent hemiarthroplasty for an osteoporotic hip fracture were included in this retrospective multicenter study. Patients who died within 12 months postoperative, who were lost to follow-up, and those with malignancy and secondary osteoporosis were excluded. Group I comprised patients who had no postoperative osteoporosis screening and treatment, and Group II comprised those who received the screening and treatment.
A total of 460 of 562 patients (82%) did not receive osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of subsequent fracture numbers and fracture sites (p = 0.296 and 0.240, respectively). Mean 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in Group II (p = 0.002).
According to our results, elderly patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for an osteoporotic hip fracture were not commonly screened or treated for osteoporosis. Our results demonstrated no significant difference between the groups in terms of subsequent fracture. However, we observed a significant high 5-year survival rate among patients who received the osteoporosis treatment.
本研究旨在调查骨质疏松症治疗在骨质疏松性髋部骨折行人工半髋关节置换术患者中的现状,并比较这些患者与未接受骨质疏松症治疗的患者的后续骨折和 5 年生存率。
本回顾性多中心研究纳入了年龄>65 岁行人工半髋关节置换术治疗骨质疏松性髋部骨折的患者。排除术后 12 个月内死亡、失访以及合并恶性肿瘤和继发性骨质疏松症的患者。Ⅰ组患者无术后骨质疏松筛查和治疗,Ⅱ组患者接受了筛查和治疗。
共有 562 例患者中的 460 例(82%)在髋部骨折后未接受骨质疏松治疗。两组患者的后续骨折数量和骨折部位无显著差异(p=0.296 和 0.240)。Ⅱ组患者的 5 年生存率显著较高(p=0.002)。
根据我们的结果,行人工半髋关节置换术治疗骨质疏松性髋部骨折的老年患者通常不会进行骨质疏松症的常规筛查或治疗。两组患者的后续骨折无显著差异。然而,我们观察到接受骨质疏松症治疗的患者的 5 年生存率显著较高。