J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Oct 18;29(6):789-794. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0147. Print 2020 Aug 1.
In some patients, ankle sprains lead to chronic symptoms like pain or muscular weakness called chronic ankle instability (CAI). External ankle supports have shown to be effective in preventing sprains and reducing recurrence, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. As sensorimotor variables are associated with injury incidence, an influence of external ankle support on landing performance and balance seems plausible.
To analyze the effects of an elastic ankle support on jump landing performance and static and dynamic balance in patients with CAI and healthy controls.
Crossover study.
Functional tests in a laboratory setting.
Twenty healthy students and 20 patients with CAI were included for study participation based on their scores in ankle stability and function questionnaires.
Healthy and CAI participants performed each test with and without an elastic ankle support.
(1) Jump landing performance was measured with the Landing Error Scoring System, (2) static balance was assessed with the Balance Error Scoring System, and (3) dynamic balance was assessed using the Y Balance Test. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the effects of the elastic ankle support on sensorimotor parameters.
Healthy controls performed significantly better in the Landing Error Scoring System (P = .01) and Y Balance Test anterior direction (P = .01). No significant effects of elastic ankle support on Landing Error Scoring System, Balance Error Scoring System, or Y Balance Test performance were observed in the CAI or control group. There were no significant group-by-ankle support interactions.
In the current study, the acute use of elastic ankle support was ineffective for enhancing jump landing performance, and static and dynamic balance. Further research is needed to identify the underlying mechanisms of the preventive effects of elastic ankle support.
在一些患者中,踝关节扭伤会导致慢性症状,如疼痛或肌肉无力,称为慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)。外部踝关节支撑已被证明可有效预防扭伤和减少复发,但潜在机制尚不清楚。由于感觉运动变量与受伤发生率相关,因此外部踝关节支撑对落地表现和平衡的影响似乎是合理的。
分析弹性踝关节支撑对 CAI 患者和健康对照组跳跃着陆表现以及静态和动态平衡的影响。
交叉研究。
实验室功能测试。
根据踝关节稳定性和功能问卷的评分,共有 20 名健康学生和 20 名 CAI 患者参与了研究。
健康和 CAI 参与者在使用和不使用弹性踝关节支撑的情况下进行了每项测试。
(1)跳跃着陆表现通过着陆错误评分系统进行测量,(2)静态平衡通过平衡错误评分系统进行评估,(3)动态平衡通过 Y 平衡测试进行评估。线性混合模型用于分析弹性踝关节支撑对感觉运动参数的影响。
健康对照组在着陆错误评分系统(P =.01)和 Y 平衡测试前向方向(P =.01)的表现明显更好。在 CAI 或对照组中,弹性踝关节支撑对着陆错误评分系统、平衡错误评分系统或 Y 平衡测试性能均无显著影响。没有观察到组-踝关节支撑的交互作用。
在本研究中,弹性踝关节支撑的急性使用并不能增强跳跃着陆表现和静态及动态平衡。需要进一步研究以确定弹性踝关节支撑的预防效果的潜在机制。