Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, RI.
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001580.
The purpose of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively analyze outcomes in operative versus nonoperative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in pediatric and adolescent patients.
Using the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, systematic searches of PubMed and EMBASE were conducted to identify English-language studies reporting outcomes in displaced pediatric midshaft clavicle fractures from 1997 to 2018.
Studies that reported on outcomes of operative and/or nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in patients younger than 19 years were included.
Patient and treatment characteristics, union rates, time to union, time to return to activity, patient-reported outcome measures, and complications were extracted.
All extracted data were recorded and qualitatively compared. QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores and Constant scores were pooled using random-effects modeling and compared among studies, which adequately reported data for hypothesis testing.
Three thousand eight hundred ten articles were identified, and 12 met inclusion criteria. These studies encompassed 497 patients with an average age of 14.1 years (8-18 years, range). Both operative and nonoperative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in this population provide excellent rates of union and patient-reported outcome measures. Compared with nonoperative management, operative management yielded faster return to activity, superior Constant scores, and equal QuickDASH scores. Operative management had higher complication rates and complications that required secondary operative treatment (mostly related to implant prominence).
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
本研究旨在系统回顾和定量分析儿童和青少年移位锁骨中段骨折的手术与非手术治疗结果。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对 PubMed 和 EMBASE 进行了系统检索,以确定 1997 年至 2018 年间报道儿童移位锁骨中段骨折手术和/或非手术治疗结果的英文文献。
纳入报道了 19 岁以下患者移位锁骨中段骨折手术和/或非手术治疗结果的研究。
提取患者和治疗特征、愈合率、愈合时间、恢复活动时间、患者报告的结果测量指标和并发症。
所有提取的数据均记录并进行定性比较。使用随机效应模型对充分报告了假设检验数据的 QuickDASH(上肢残疾问卷)评分和 Constant 评分进行了汇总和比较。
共确定了 3810 篇文章,其中 12 篇符合纳入标准。这些研究共纳入了 497 名患者,平均年龄为 14.1 岁(8-18 岁,范围)。该人群中,移位锁骨中段骨折的手术和非手术治疗均能获得很高的愈合率和患者报告的结果测量指标。与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗能更快地恢复活动,更好的 Constant 评分,且相同的 QuickDASH 评分。手术治疗的并发症发生率更高,需要二次手术治疗的并发症也更多(主要与植入物突出有关)。
治疗性三级。欲了解完整的证据水平说明,请参见作者须知。