King Saud University College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Jan;129(1):65-71.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
The objective was to identify the lowest doses required to detect and measure the position of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images using filtered backprojection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstructions (SAFIRE) 3 and SAFIRE 5.
Four cadaveric mandibles were imaged using a reference protocol with standard dose and FBP and 3 ultra-low-dose protocols (LD1-LD3), using an MDCT scanner. All test examinations were reconstructed with FBP, SAFIRE 3, and SAFIRE 5. Subjective visibility of the IAC in the images and digital measurements of the height of the ridge above the IAC were recorded from test images and compared with those from the reference image using one-sample t tests, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression.
Subjective visibility comparable to the standard protocol was obtained with an 84.6% dose reduction using the LD2 protocol. No statistically significant difference was found between the height measurements from the reference protocol and any of the LD1 and LD2 protocols. The t tests indicated a significant difference between the measurements from the reference and all LD3 test protocols. SAFIRE did not have an advantage over FBP images.
Significant dose reduction from the reference dose can allow adequate detection and measurements of the IAC.
本研究旨在使用滤波反投影(filtered backprojection,FBP)和正弦图确认迭代重建(sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstructions,SAFIRE)3 代和 SAFIRE 5 代,确定在多层螺旋 CT(multidetector computed tomography,MDCT)图像上检测和测量下颌管(inferior alveolar canal,IAC)位置所需的最低剂量。
4 具尸体下颌骨采用标准剂量和 FBP 的参考方案以及 3 种超低剂量方案(LD1-LD3)进行 MDCT 扫描成像。所有测试检查均使用 FBP、SAFIRE 3 和 SAFIRE 5 进行重建。从测试图像中记录 IAC 在图像中的主观可见性以及 IAC 上方嵴高度的数字测量值,并与参考图像进行比较,使用单样本 t 检验、Bland-Altman 图和线性回归进行比较。
使用 LD2 方案可将剂量降低 84.6%,获得与标准方案相当的主观可见度。参考方案与 LD1 和 LD2 方案中的任何一个方案的高度测量值之间均无统计学差异。t 检验表明,参考和所有 LD3 测试方案之间的测量值存在显著差异。SAFIRE 并不优于 FBP 图像。
与参考剂量相比,显著降低剂量可确保 IAC 的充分检测和测量。