Suppr超能文献

基于压力和速度的股浅动脉疾病充血期狭窄病变的生理评估:充血期狭窄阻力的重要性

Pressure- and Velocity-Based Physiological Assessment of Stenotic Lesions at Hyperemia in Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: Importance of Hyperemic Stenosis Resistance.

作者信息

Ikeoka Kuniyasu, Watanabe Tetsuya, Shinoda Yukinori, Minamisaka Tomoko, Fukuoka Hidetada, Inui Hirooki, Ueno Keisuke, Inoue Soki, Mine Kentaro, Hoshida Shiro

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Dis. 2019 Sep 25;12(3):362-366. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.19-00034.

Abstract

In superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenosis, stenosis resistance may increase, but the relationship between stenosis resistance and stenotic severity remains to be seen. This study aimed to investigate the physiological response, through a hyperemic condition, and the pathophysiological significance of Doppler flow and stenosis resistance in SFA. Twenty-four limbs with focal stenosis of the SFA were analyzed. We assessed the fractional flow reserve (FFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (h-SR), and vascular flow reserve (VFR) of the SFA with a pressure/Doppler flow sensor-tipped combination guidewire before and after endovascular therapy (EVT). FFR, h-SR, and VFR changed significantly after EVT. h-SR was more strongly correlated with % area stenosis, measured by intravascular ultrasound than FFR (FFR: r=-0.716, h-SR: r=0.741, p<0.0001, respectively). However, VFR was not associated with % area stenosis. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed cut-offs h-SR >0.36 mmHg·sec/cm, and FFR <0.88 predicted >75% area stenosis with area under curves of 0.883 and 0.828, respectively. h-SR can indicate stenotic severity in an SFA focal lesion more prominently than FFR and may be a new physiological index to determine indication for EVT. VFR was not feasible for assessment in SFA focal stenosis.

摘要

在股浅动脉(SFA)狭窄中,狭窄阻力可能会增加,但狭窄阻力与狭窄严重程度之间的关系仍有待观察。本研究旨在通过充血状态研究SFA中多普勒血流和狭窄阻力的生理反应及其病理生理意义。对24条存在SFA局灶性狭窄的肢体进行了分析。我们使用压力/多普勒血流传感器尖端组合导丝在血管内治疗(EVT)前后评估了SFA的血流储备分数(FFR)、充血性狭窄阻力(h-SR)和血管血流储备(VFR)。EVT后FFR、h-SR和VFR发生了显著变化。与FFR相比,h-SR与通过血管内超声测量的面积狭窄百分比的相关性更强(FFR:r = -0.716,h-SR:r = 0.741,p均<0.0001)。然而,VFR与面积狭窄百分比无关。受试者工作特征曲线显示,h-SR>0.36 mmHg·sec/cm和FFR<0.88分别预测面积狭窄>75%,曲线下面积分别为0.883和0.828。与FFR相比,h-SR能更显著地指示SFA局灶性病变的狭窄严重程度,可能是确定EVT适应症的一种新的生理指标。VFR在评估SFA局灶性狭窄时不可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/6766760/9cd694f1492c/avd-12-3-oa.19-00034-figure01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验