Ananian Charles E, Davis R Daniel, Johnson Eric L, Regulski Matthew J, Reyzelman Alexander M, Saunders Molly C, Danilkovitch Alla
New Hope Podiatry, Los Angeles, California.
Family Podiatry Center, Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2019 Nov 1;8(11):546-554. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1028. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
To evaluate the clinical outcomes of lyopreserved placental membrane containing viable cells (vLPM) in the treatment of nonhealing wounds of various etiologies, and to compare them to those previously reported for cryopreserved placental membrane containing viable cells (vCPM). Patients with nonhealing wounds who qualified to receive advanced wound therapies were consecutively enrolled and treated weekly with vLPM plus standard of care (SOC) at five centers. Data were de-identified and retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included closure, time to closure, number of vLPM applications, and adverse events (AEs). Seventy-eight patients with 98 wounds (41 diabetic foot ulcers [DFUs], 19 venous leg ulcers [VLUs], 10 surgical, and 28 others) with an average size of 13.3 cm and 8.7 months duration were treated. Fifty-eight of the 98 wounds (59.2%) achieved complete closure with median time to closure of 63 days and 6 vLPM applications. The closure by wound etiology was 63% for DFUs, 47% for VLUs, 70% for surgical wounds, and 57% for other types of wounds. Similar closure rates have been previously demonstrated for vCPM. Wound duration was the main predictor of closure: 65.8% versus 30.0% ( = 0.004) closure was achieved for wounds of ≤12 and >12 months duration, respectively. There were no AEs related to vLPM application. This is the first multicenter case series evaluating the clinical outcomes of vLPM in a real-world setting. These results support clinical equivalency between the two placental membrane formulations with the added convenience of room-temperature storage for vLPM, allowing it to be used in any wound-care setting.
为评估含活细胞的冻干保存胎盘膜(vLPM)治疗各种病因所致难愈伤口的临床疗效,并将其与先前报道的含活细胞的冷冻保存胎盘膜(vCPM)的疗效进行比较。符合接受高级伤口治疗条件的难愈伤口患者在五个中心连续入组,并每周接受vLPM加标准护理(SOC)治疗。对数据进行去识别并进行回顾性分析。结局指标包括伤口闭合情况、闭合时间、vLPM应用次数及不良事件(AE)。共治疗了78例患者的98处伤口(41例糖尿病足溃疡[DFU]、19例下肢静脉溃疡[VLU]、10例手术伤口及28例其他伤口),伤口平均大小为13.3厘米,病程为8.7个月。98处伤口中有58处(59.2%)实现完全闭合,闭合的中位时间为63天,vLPM平均应用6次。按伤口病因划分的闭合率分别为:DFU为63%,VLU为47%,手术伤口为70%,其他类型伤口为57%。先前vCPM已显示出类似的闭合率。伤口病程是闭合的主要预测因素:病程≤12个月和>12个月的伤口闭合率分别为65.8%和30.0%(P = 0.004)。未发生与vLPM应用相关的不良事件。这是首个在真实世界环境中评估vLPM临床疗效的多中心病例系列研究。这些结果支持两种胎盘膜制剂在临床上具有等效性,且vLPM具有室温储存的便利性,可在任何伤口护理环境中使用。