María José Robles Raya, Geriatric Department Parc de Salut Mar, Mailing address: Paseo Marítimo, 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Phone: 93 248 30 00, Fax: 93 248 32 54, E-mail:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):870-875. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1272-0.
To ascertain the usefulness of a simulated clinical scene with actors in the classroom (theatrical performance) as a teaching tool for the management of falls and their related injuries.
Experimental design of two related groups.
Spain.
A group of 12 students attended a seminar in which the approach to a clinical case was made using a simulated scene with actors in the classroom (scene group); a non-scene group of 34 students attended the seminar, without a theatrical performance (the same clinical case was read and presented in a traditional manner, oral presentation).
Before and after the seminar, students answered a questionnaire [five questions on theoretical knowledge of falls and osteoporosis (score 0-10) and two on subjective learning perception (linear scale: 0-10) (score 0-20)]. In the scene group were two further questions included at the end on their opinion of the scene and on the seminar overall.
Both groups significantly improved in all questionnaire scores after the seminar (p=0.001). The scene group had a greater rise in mean points of the questionnaire before and after the seminar than the non-scene group: theoretical knowledge [3.81±1.69 versus 2.75±1.33 (p=0.033)], subjective questions [6.08±4.10 versus 4.97±2.24 (p=0.247)], and the questionnaire overall [9.89±4.98 versus 7.72±2.66 (p=0.060)]. The scene group had a very good opinion of the usefulness of the scene and of the overall opinion of the seminar: 9.08±0.95 and 9.41±0.79.
Theatrical performance in the classroom seems to promote better learning than classic oral presentation, providing qualitative value by adding creativity and different approaches to the teaching of medicine.
确定在课堂上使用演员模拟临床场景(戏剧表演)作为跌倒及其相关伤害管理教学工具的有效性。
两组相关实验设计。
西班牙。
一组 12 名学生参加了一个研讨会,在该研讨会上,使用课堂上的演员模拟场景(场景组)来处理临床病例;另一组 34 名学生没有参加戏剧表演(以传统方式阅读和呈现相同的临床病例,即口头陈述)。
研讨会前后,学生回答问卷[五个关于跌倒和骨质疏松症理论知识的问题(0-10 分)和两个关于主观学习感知的问题(0-10 分的线性量表)(0-20 分)]。在场景组中,还在最后增加了两个关于他们对场景和研讨会整体的看法的问题。
两组学生在研讨会后所有问卷得分均显著提高(p=0.001)。与非场景组相比,场景组在研讨会前后的问卷平均分数有更大的提高:理论知识[3.81±1.69 与 2.75±1.33(p=0.033)]、主观问题[6.08±4.10 与 4.97±2.24(p=0.247)]和问卷总分[9.89±4.98 与 7.72±2.66(p=0.060]。场景组对场景的有用性和对整个研讨会的总体看法评价非常好:9.08±0.95 和 9.41±0.79。
课堂上的戏剧表演似乎比经典的口头陈述更能促进更好的学习,通过增加创造力和医学教学的不同方法提供了定性价值。