Academic Department of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):441-447. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02060-1. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Incisional hernias are a common complication of emergency laparotomy and are associated with significant morbidity. Recent studies have found a reduction in incisional hernias when mesh is placed prophylactically during abdominal closure in elective laparotomies. This systematic review will assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic mesh placement in emergency laparotomy.
A systematic review was performed according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42018109283). Papers were dual screened for eligibility, and included when a comparison was made between closure with prophylactic mesh and closure with a standard technique, reported using a comparative design (i.e. case-control, cohort or randomised trial), where the primary outcome was incisional hernia. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomised studies tool. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia rate was performed to estimate risk ratio using a random effects model (Mantel-Haenszel approach).
332 studies were screened for eligibility, 29 full texts were reviewed and 2 non-randomised studies were included. Both studies were biased due to confounding factors, as closure technique was based on patient risk factors for incisional hernia. Both studies found significantly fewer incisional hernias in the mesh groups [3.2% vs 28.6% (p < 0.001) and 5.9% vs 33.3% (p = 0.0001)]. A meta-analysis of incisional hernia risk favoured prophylactic mesh closure [risk ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.6-0.35, p < 0.001)]. Neither study found an association between mesh and infection or enterocutaneous fistula.
This review found that there are limited data to assess the effect or safety profile of prophylactic mesh in the emergency laparotomy setting. The current data cannot reliably assess the use of mesh due to confounding factors, and a randomised controlled trial is required to address this important clinical question.
切口疝是急诊剖腹术的常见并发症,与显著的发病率相关。最近的研究发现,在择期剖腹术中预防性放置网片关闭腹部时,切口疝的发生率降低。本系统评价将评估在急诊剖腹术中预防性放置网片的安全性和有效性。
根据 PROSPERO 注册方案(CRD42018109283)进行系统评价。对论文进行了双重筛选,以确定其是否符合条件,并纳入了预防性放置网片与标准技术(即病例对照、队列或随机试验)的比较,主要结局是切口疝。使用 Cochrane 非随机研究偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。使用随机效应模型(Mantel-Haenszel 方法)对切口疝发生率进行meta 分析,以估计风险比。
对 332 篇研究进行了筛选,对 29 篇全文进行了审查,纳入了 2 项非随机研究。由于闭合技术基于切口疝的患者危险因素,这两项研究都存在偏倚。这两项研究都发现网片组的切口疝明显较少[3.2%比 28.6%(p<0.001)和 5.9%比 33.3%(p=0.0001)]。切口疝风险的 meta 分析有利于预防性网片闭合[风险比 0.15(95%置信区间 0.6-0.35,p<0.001)]。这两项研究都没有发现网片与感染或肠皮肤瘘之间的关联。
本综述发现,目前评估预防性网片在急诊剖腹术环境中的效果或安全性概况的数据有限。由于混杂因素,目前的数据无法可靠地评估网片的使用,需要进行随机对照试验来解决这一重要的临床问题。