Department of Internal Medicine.
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jan;17(1):89-97. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201907-514OC.
Postsepsis care recommendations target specific deficits experienced by sepsis survivors in elements such as optimization of medications, screening for functional impairments, monitoring for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and consideration of palliative care. However, few data are available regarding the application of these elements in clinical practice. To quantify the delivery of postsepsis care for patients discharged after hospital admission for sepsis and evaluate the association between receipt of postsepsis care elements and reduced mortality and hospital readmission within 90 days. We conducted a retrospective chart review of a random sample of patients who were discharged alive after an admission for sepsis (identified from discharge codes) at 10 hospitals during 2017. We used a structured chart abstraction to determine whether four elements of postsepsis care were provided within 90 days of hospital discharge, per expert recommendations. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between receipt of care elements and 90-day hospital readmission and mortality, adjusted for age, comorbidity, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Among 189 sepsis survivors, 117 (62%) had medications optimized, 123 (65%) had screening for functional or mental health impairments, 86 (46%) were monitored for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and 110 (58%) had care alignment processes documented (i.e., assessed for palliative care or goals of care). Only 20 (11%) received all four care elements within 90 days. Within 90 days of discharge, 66 (35%) patients were readmitted and 33 (17%) died (total patients readmitted or died, = 82). Receipt of two (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.10-0.69) or more (three OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.72; four OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.50) care elements was associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality compared with zero or one element documented. Optimization of medications (no medication errors vs. one or more errors; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92), documented functional or mental health assessments (physical function plus swallowing/mental health assessments vs. no assessments; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.40), and documented goals of care or palliative care screening (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.05; not statistically significant) were associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality. In this retrospective cohort study of data from a single health system, we found variable delivery of recommended postsepsis care elements that were associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after hospitalization for sepsis. Implementation strategies to efficiently overcome barriers to adopting recommended postsepsis care may help improve outcomes for sepsis survivors.
在败血症幸存者中,推荐的败血症后护理建议针对特定的缺陷,如优化药物、筛查功能障碍、监测常见和可预防的健康恶化原因,以及考虑姑息治疗。然而,关于这些元素在临床实践中的应用的数据很少。为了量化败血症幸存者出院后接受的败血症后护理,并评估接受败血症后护理元素与 90 天内死亡率和再入院率降低之间的关系。我们对 2017 年在 10 家医院因败血症住院并出院(根据出院代码确定)的随机患者样本进行了回顾性图表审查。我们使用结构化图表摘录来确定是否在出院后 90 天内提供了专家建议的四项败血症后护理元素。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估接受护理元素与 90 天内医院再入院和死亡率之间的关系,调整了年龄、合并症、住院时间和出院处置。在 189 名败血症幸存者中,有 117 名(62%)优化了药物,123 名(65%)筛查了功能或心理健康障碍,86 名(46%)监测了常见和可预防的健康恶化原因,有 110 名(58%)记录了护理对准过程(即评估姑息治疗或护理目标)。只有 20 人(11%)在 90 天内接受了所有四项护理元素。出院后 90 天内,有 66 名(35%)患者再次入院,33 名(17%)死亡(总再入院或死亡患者,=82)。与记录零个或一个元素相比,接受两个(比值比 [OR],0.26;95%置信区间 [95%CI],0.10-0.69)或更多(三个 OR,0.28;95%CI,0.11-0.72;四个 OR,0.12;95%CI,0.03-0.50)护理元素与 90 天内再入院或 90 天内死亡率较低的几率相关。与一个或多个错误相比,药物优化(无药物错误与一个或多个错误;OR,0.44;95%CI,0.21-0.92)、记录的功能或心理健康评估(身体功能加吞咽/心理健康评估与无评估;OR,0.14;95%CI,0.05-0.40)和记录的护理目标或姑息治疗筛查(OR,0.52;95%CI,0.25-1.05;无统计学意义)与 90 天内再入院或 90 天内死亡率较低的几率相关。在这项针对单一健康系统数据的回顾性队列研究中,我们发现推荐的败血症后护理元素的实施情况存在差异,这些元素与败血症住院后发病率和死亡率的降低有关。实施策略以有效地克服采用推荐的败血症后护理的障碍可能有助于改善败血症幸存者的结局。