Suppr超能文献

脓毒症后再入院模式的差异:一项针对退伍军人事务部受益人的队列研究。

Variation in Postsepsis Readmission Patterns: A Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Beneficiaries.

作者信息

Prescott Hallie C

机构信息

1 VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Innovation, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and.

2 Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):230-237. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-398OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Rehospitalization is common after sepsis, but little is known about the variation in readmission patterns across patient groups and care locations.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the variation in postsepsis readmission rates and diagnoses by patient age, nursing facility use, admission year, and hospital among U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries.

METHODS

Observational cohort study of VA beneficiaries who survived a sepsis hospitalization (2009-2011) at 114 VA hospitals, stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 yr), nursing home usage (none, chronic, or acute), year of admission (2009, 2010, 2011), and hospital. In the primary analysis, sepsis hospitalizations were identified using a previously validated method. Sensitivity analyses were performed using alternative definitions with explicit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for sepsis, and separately for severe sepsis and septic shock.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcomes were rate of 90-day all-cause hospital readmission after sepsis hospitalization and proportion of readmissions resulting from specific diagnoses, including the proportion of "potentially preventable" readmissions. Readmission diagnoses were similar from 2009 to 2011, with little variation in readmission rates across hospitals. The top six readmission diagnoses (heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) accounted for 30% of all readmissions. Although about one in five readmissions had a principal diagnosis for infection, 58% of all readmissions received early systemic antibiotics. Infection accounted for a greater proportion of readmissions among patients discharged to nursing facilities compared with patients discharged to home (25.0-27.1% vs. 16.8%) and among older vs. younger patients (22.2% vs. 15.8%). Potentially preventable readmissions accounted for a quarter of readmissions overall and were more common among older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital readmission rates after sepsis were similar by site and admission year. Heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection were common readmission diagnoses across all patient groups. Readmission for infection and potentially preventable diagnoses were more common in older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities.

摘要

理论依据

脓毒症后再入院情况常见,但对于不同患者群体和护理地点的再入院模式差异知之甚少。

目的

研究美国退伍军人事务部(VA)受益人群中,脓毒症后再入院率及诊断情况因患者年龄、护理机构使用情况、入院年份和医院的差异。

方法

对在114家VA医院因脓毒症住院存活(2009 - 2011年)的VA受益人群进行观察性队列研究,按年龄(<65岁与≥65岁)、疗养院使用情况(无、慢性或急性)、入院年份(2009年、2010年、2011年)和医院分层。在主要分析中,使用先前验证的方法识别脓毒症住院病例。使用明确的《国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修订本》脓毒症编码以及分别针对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的替代定义进行敏感性分析。

测量指标和主要结果

主要结局指标为脓毒症住院后90天全因再入院率以及特定诊断导致的再入院比例,包括“潜在可预防”再入院比例。2009年至2011年再入院诊断相似,各医院再入院率变化不大。前六大再入院诊断(心力衰竭、肺炎、脓毒症、尿路感染、急性肾衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺疾病)占所有再入院病例的30%。尽管约五分之一的再入院病例主要诊断为感染,但所有再入院病例中有58%接受了早期全身性抗生素治疗。与出院回家的患者相比,入住护理机构的患者再入院病例中感染所占比例更高(25.0 - 27.1%对16.8%),老年患者比年轻患者更高(22.2%对15.8%)。潜在可预防的再入院病例占总体再入院病例的四分之一,在老年患者和入住护理机构的患者中更为常见。

结论

脓毒症后的医院再入院率因地点和入院年份相似。心力衰竭、肺炎、脓毒症和尿路感染是所有患者群体常见的再入院诊断。感染再入院和潜在可预防诊断在老年患者和入住护理机构的患者中更为常见。

相似文献

1
Variation in Postsepsis Readmission Patterns: A Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Beneficiaries.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):230-237. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-398OC.
2
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2. The Trajectories of Sepsis, 2012-2018.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):289-301. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004226.
3
Post-Acute Care Use and Hospital Readmission after Sepsis.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jun;12(6):904-13. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-504OC.
4
Causes and timing of 30-day rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities after a hospital admission for pneumonia or sepsis.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0260664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260664. eCollection 2022.
5
Frequency and diagnoses associated with 7- and 30-day readmission of skilled nursing facility patients to a nonteaching community hospital.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Mar;12(3):195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.02.015. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
7
Association of Fragmented Readmissions and Electronic Information Sharing With Discharge Destination Among Older Adults.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313592. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13592.
8
Association between Adherence to Recommended Care and Outcomes for Adult Survivors of Sepsis.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jan;17(1):89-97. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201907-514OC.
9
Frequency, cost, and risk factors of readmissions among severe sepsis survivors.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):738-46. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000859.
10
Posthospital Fall Injuries and 30-Day Readmissions in Adults 65 Years and Older.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4276.

引用本文的文献

2
Home care after intensive care unit-discharge: global differences.
Crit Care Sci. 2025 May 26;37:e20250269. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250269. eCollection 2025.
3
Unmasking the hidden aftermath: postintensive care unit sequelae, discharge preparedness, and long-term follow-up.
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Jun 14;36:e20240265en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240265-en. eCollection 2024.
4
M2 Microglia-Derived Exosomes Protect Against Glutamate-Induced HT22 Cell Injury via Exosomal miR-124-3p.
Mol Neurobiol. 2024 Oct;61(10):7845-7861. doi: 10.1007/s12035-024-04075-x. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;13(1):46. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010046.
6
Cardiac dysfunction in survivors of sepsis: a scoping review.
Open Heart. 2023 Dec 7;10(2):e002454. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002454.
7
Risk Factor Analysis of Hospital Readmissions at St. Petersburg General Hospital.
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Feb 28;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1415. eCollection 2023.
9
Causes and timing of 30-day rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities after a hospital admission for pneumonia or sepsis.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0260664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260664. eCollection 2022.
10
Association between sepsis survivorship and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Sep;47(9):931-942. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06479-y. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
Rehospitalizations Following Sepsis: Common and Costly.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2085-93. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001159.
4
5
Dual-System Use and Intermediate Health Outcomes among Veterans Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1868-90. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12303. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
6
Temporal Changes in the Influence of Hospitals and Regional Healthcare Networks on Severe Sepsis Mortality.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1368-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000970.
9
Post-Acute Care Use and Hospital Readmission after Sepsis.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jun;12(6):904-13. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-504OC.
10
Frequency, cost, and risk factors of readmissions among severe sepsis survivors.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):738-46. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000859.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验