Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jan-Feb;50:e18-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.09.023. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
To describe worldwide characteristics, performance and risk factors of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs), in pediatrics.
A secondary, subgroup analysis of pediatric (<18 years) data was undertaken, using a global, cross-sectional study of PIVCs. Practice characteristics included: demographic, diagnostic, utility, management, performance and resources. Multivariate regression identified complication risks factors.
Data from 4206 children in 278 hospitals across 47 countries. Most PIVCs (outside of Australia, New Zealand) were inserted by nurses (71%; n = 2950), with dedicated teams only common in North America (23.2%; n = 85). Large gauges (≤18G) were mostly used in South America, Europe and Africa. Regions predominantly placed 24G (49%; n = 2060) except in Australia and New Zealand, who more commonly placed 22G (38.7%; n = 192). The most common placement was the hand (51%; n = 2143), however North America, Australia and New Zealand frequently utilised the antecubital fossa (24.5%, n = 90; 21.4%; n = 106). Polyurethane dressings were most used (67.1%; 2822), and many were not clean, dry and intact (17.1%; n = 715). Over 8% of PIVCs were idle, with the highest rates in North America (21.2%; n = 78). PIVC local complication risk factors included: >2 years age (odds ratio [OR] > 1.58; 1.2-2.1); ambulance/emergency insertion (OR 1.65; 1.2-2.3); upper arm/antecubital placement (OR 1.44; 1.1-2.0); poor dressing integrity (OR 5.4; 4.2-6.9); and 24-72 h dwell (OR > 1.9; 1.3-2.6).
There is global inconsistency in pediatric PIVC practice, which may be causing harm.
Improvements in pediatric PIVC placement, dressings, and gauge selection are needed.
描述全球范围内儿科外周静脉导管(PIVC)的特点、性能和风险因素。
使用全球儿科 PIVC 横断面研究进行儿科(<18 岁)数据的二次亚组分析。实践特征包括:人口统计学、诊断、用途、管理、性能和资源。多变量回归确定了并发症风险因素。
来自 47 个国家 278 家医院的 4206 名儿童的数据。大多数 PIVC(澳大利亚、新西兰除外)由护士插入(71%;n=2950),只有在北美才有专门的团队(23.2%;n=85)。大口径导管(≤18G)主要在南美、欧洲和非洲使用。除澳大利亚和新西兰外,大多数地区主要放置 24G(49%;n=2060),澳大利亚和新西兰更常见的是放置 22G(38.7%;n=192)。最常见的部位是手部(51%;n=2143),但北美、澳大利亚和新西兰经常使用肘窝(24.5%,n=90;21.4%,n=106)。最常使用的是聚氨酯敷料(67.1%;2822),但许多敷料不干净、干燥和完整(17.1%;n=715)。超过 8%的 PIVC 处于闲置状态,北美地区的闲置率最高(21.2%;n=78)。PIVC 局部并发症的风险因素包括:年龄>2 岁(比值比[OR]>1.58;1.2-2.1);救护车/急诊插入(OR 1.65;1.2-2.3);上臂/肘窝放置(OR 1.44;1.1-2.0);敷料完整性差(OR 5.4;4.2-6.9);和 24-72 小时留置(OR>1.9;1.3-2.6)。
儿科 PIVC 实践存在全球不一致性,这可能会造成伤害。
需要改进儿科 PIVC 置管、敷料和导管选择。