Department of Entomology, Plant Sciences Building 3138, 4291 Fieldhouse Dr., University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, 875 Perimeter Dr. MS 3051, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Ann Bot. 2020 Mar 9;125(3):433-445. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz172.
The diversity of floral morphology among plant species has long captured the interest of biologists and led to the development of a number of explanatory theories. Floral morphology varies substantially within species, and the mechanisms maintaining this diversity are diverse. One possibility is that spatial variation in the pollinator fauna drives the evolution of spatially divergent floral ecotypes adapted to the local suite of pollinators. Another possibility is that geographic variation in the abiotic environment and local climatic conditions favours different floral morphologies in different regions. Although both possibilities have been shown to explain floral variation in some cases, they have rarely been competed against one another using data collected from large spatial scales. In this study, we assess floral variation in relation to climate and floral visitors in four oil-reward-specialized pollination interactions.
We used a combination of large-scale plant and pollinator samplings, morphological measures and climatic data. We analysed the data using spatial approaches, as well as traditional multivariate and structural equation modelling approaches.
Our results indicate that the four species have different levels of specialization, and that this can be explained by their climatic niche breadth. In addition, our results show that, at least for some species, floral morphology can be explained by the identity of floral visitors, with climate having only an indirect effect.
Our results demonstrate that, even in very specialized interactions, both biotic and abiotic variables can explain a substantial amount of intraspecific variation in floral morphology.
植物物种之间花朵形态的多样性长期以来一直吸引着生物学家的兴趣,并催生了许多解释性理论。物种内的花朵形态有很大的差异,维持这种多样性的机制也多种多样。一种可能是传粉动物区系的空间变化驱动了适应当地传粉者集合的空间发散的花型生态型的进化。另一种可能是,非生物环境和当地气候条件的地理变化有利于不同地区形成不同的花形态。尽管这两种可能性在某些情况下都被证明可以解释花朵的变异,但它们很少在使用从大空间尺度收集的数据来相互竞争。在这项研究中,我们评估了四个与石油回报相关的专门传粉相互作用中与气候和花朵传粉者有关的花朵变异。
我们结合了大规模的植物和传粉者采样、形态测量和气候数据。我们使用空间方法以及传统的多元和结构方程建模方法来分析数据。
我们的结果表明,这四个物种的专业化程度不同,这可以用它们的气候生态位宽度来解释。此外,我们的结果表明,至少对于一些物种来说,花朵形态可以通过花朵传粉者的身份来解释,而气候只有间接影响。
我们的结果表明,即使在非常专门的相互作用中,生物和非生物变量都可以解释花朵形态的大量种内变异。