GTD Scientific Inc., North Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):E457-E464. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003291.
STUDY DESIGN: This article comprises a review of the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the different types of structural failures exhibited in intervertebral discs (IVDs), summarize their potential causes with respect to mechanical loading conditions and the consequences on cell homeostasis and biomechanics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many studies have been performed to gain insight into how discogenic back pain progresses in humans both in vitro and in vivo as well as in animal disc models. However, there is a major need to summarize the common factors which initiate the structural failures observed in IVDs and the typical biomechanical changes. This work could help in developing mechanisms aiming to restore the biochemical and biomechanical balance of IVDs. METHODS: The different types of structural failures encountered in IVDs were reviewed from published literature. The types of mechanical loading causing these injuries and their physiological and biomechanical consequences were then summarized and linked to ongoing research in this area. RESULTS: The most prominent structural failures associated with IVDs are annulus tears, disc prolapse, endplate damage, disc narrowing, radial bulging, and osteophyte formation in the vertebrae. IVDs were found to be vulnerable to compression, flexion, axial rotation, and complex loading mechanisms through single impact, cyclical, and continuous loading. However, chronic loadings had a more damaging impact on the spine. Significant consequences include imbalance of metabolic enzymes and growth factors, alteration in stress profiles of IVDs and a decrease in mechanical stiffness resulting in impaired biomechanics of the spine. CONCLUSION: The mode of loading has an important impact on the severity and nature of failures seen in IVDs and the resulting consequences to biomechanics. However, further research is necessary to better understand to the mechanisms that link injury to degeneration and regeneration of IVD tissues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
研究设计:本文包括文献综述。
目的:本研究旨在阐明椎间盘(IVD)中表现出的不同类型的结构失效,总结其在机械加载条件下的潜在原因及其对细胞内稳态和生物力学的影响。
背景资料概要:许多研究已经进行,以深入了解椎间盘源性腰痛在体外和体内以及动物椎间盘模型中如何进展。然而,非常有必要总结导致 IVD 中观察到的结构失效的常见因素以及典型的生物力学变化。这项工作有助于开发旨在恢复 IVD 生化和生物力学平衡的机制。
方法:从已发表的文献中回顾了 IVD 中遇到的不同类型的结构失效。然后总结了导致这些损伤的机械加载类型及其生理和生物力学后果,并将其与该领域正在进行的研究联系起来。
结果:与 IVD 相关的最突出的结构失效是纤维环撕裂、椎间盘突出、终板损伤、椎间盘狭窄、放射状膨出和椎体上的骨赘形成。研究发现,IVD 容易受到压缩、弯曲、轴向旋转以及通过单次冲击、循环和连续加载的复杂加载机制的影响。然而,慢性负荷对脊柱的破坏性更大。重大后果包括代谢酶和生长因子的失衡、IVD 应力分布的改变以及机械刚度的降低,导致脊柱生物力学受损。
结论:加载方式对 IVD 中失效的严重程度和性质以及对生物力学的影响有重要影响。然而,需要进一步的研究来更好地理解将损伤与 IVD 组织的退变和再生联系起来的机制。
证据水平:3 级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020-4-15
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011-10-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017-1-15
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009-5
Pharmaceutics. 2025-2-28
Biomolecules. 2025-2-11