Department of Pediatrics.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Jan;70(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002525.
Increasing evidence supports simulation-based training; however, limited data exist regarding its use in pediatric gastroenterology (GI). We explored the use of simulation-based endoscopy training in pediatric GI fellowship programs across North America.
GI fellowship program directors (PDs) from the United States and Canada were surveyed between August to November 2018. The pretested, electronic survey comprised 3 sections: program demographics; details of current simulation-based training; and PDs' perceptions of endoscopy simulation. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Forty-three of 71 (61%) PDs responded (6 Canadian, 37 US). Programs were predominantly academic (95%) and enrolled 1.87 ± 1.01 fellows/yr. Twenty-four programs (56%) reported using simulation for endoscopy training, whereas 8 (19%) used simulation for nonprocedural education. Only 2 programs (5%) used endoscopy simulation for assessment. Of those using simulation (n = 24), upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were trained most frequently, and mechanical simulators were used most commonly. Eight programs (33%) required simulation training prior to clinical performance. Although 10 programs (42%) provided protected training time, only 2 (8%) tracked hours. Three programs (13%) reported having an organized curriculum and 6 (25%) train their endoscopic trainers. Cost, time constraints, and lack of a standardized curriculum were perceived as key barriers to integration. Most PDs reported a need for endoscopy simulation to train both technical and nontechnical skills; however, they felt simulation cannot replace clinical experience.
PDs recognize the potential importance of endoscopy simulation, particularly for novices; however, only 56% report using it. Perceived barriers indicate the need for inexpensive portable simulators and a validated pediatric simulation curriculum to promote uptake.
越来越多的证据支持基于模拟的培训;然而,关于其在儿科胃肠病学(GI)中的应用的数据有限。我们探讨了北美儿科胃肠病学 fellowship 项目中基于模拟的内镜培训的使用情况。
2018 年 8 月至 11 月期间,对来自美国和加拿大的胃肠病学 fellowship 项目主任(PD)进行了调查。这份经过预先测试的电子调查问卷由 3 个部分组成:项目概况;目前基于模拟的培训细节;以及 PD 对内镜模拟的看法。使用描述性统计方法对回答进行分析。
71 名 PD 中有 43 名(61%)做出了回应(6 名来自加拿大,37 名来自美国)。项目主要是学术性的(95%),每年招收 1.87±1.01 名学员。24 个项目(56%)报告使用模拟进行内镜培训,而 8 个项目(19%)使用模拟进行非程序教育。只有 2 个项目(5%)使用内镜模拟进行评估。在使用模拟的项目中(n=24),上消化道内镜和结肠镜检查培训最为频繁,使用最多的是机械模拟器。8 个项目(33%)要求在进行临床操作前进行模拟培训。尽管 10 个项目(42%)提供了受保护的培训时间,但只有 2 个项目(8%)记录了培训时间。3 个项目(13%)报告有组织的课程,6 个项目(25%)培训他们的内镜培训师。成本、时间限制和缺乏标准化课程被认为是整合的关键障碍。大多数 PD 报告说,需要内镜模拟来培训技术和非技术技能;然而,他们认为模拟不能替代临床经验。
PD 认识到内镜模拟的潜在重要性,特别是对新手而言;然而,只有 56%的人报告使用模拟。感知到的障碍表明需要价格低廉、便携的模拟器和经过验证的儿科模拟课程,以促进其应用。