Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kitano Hospital, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Feb;91(2):373-381.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Histologic diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) using EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is difficult. To address this issue, new fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles were recently developed. Here, we prospectively evaluated 2 newly designed EUS-FNB needles for histologic evaluation in patients with type 1 AIP.
This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing biopsy specimens obtained with a 22-gauge Franseen needle or a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle in patients with suspected type 1 AIP. AIP was diagnosed according to international consensus diagnostic criteria. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-FNB needles, and secondary endpoints were the amount of specimen obtained, histology of the pancreas based on evaluation of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), and contribution of histologic findings to the diagnosis of AIP.
One hundred ten patients were randomly assigned to the Franseen group (22-gauge Franseen needle) or the forward-bevel group (20-gauge forward-bevel needle). EUS-FNB sampling was successful in all patients. Nine patients were excluded because of diagnoses other than AIP. Compared with the forward-bevel needle, the Franseen needle obtained a significantly greater number of high-power fields. Of 101 patients, 39 patients (78%) in the Franseen group and 23 patients (45%) in the Forward-bevel group were diagnosed with level 1 or 2 LPSP (P = .001). Thirty-six patients could not be diagnosed with type 1 AIP without EUS-FNB specimen results.
The 22-gauge Franseen needle should be routinely used for histologic diagnosis of type 1 AIP. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000027668.).
使用 EUS 引导下 FNA(EUS-FNA)进行自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)的组织学诊断较为困难。为解决这一问题,最近开发了新型细针活检(FNB)针。在此,我们前瞻性评估了两种新设计的 EUS-FNA 针在 1 型 AIP 患者中的组织学评估效果。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验,比较了在疑似 1 型 AIP 患者中使用 22G Franseen 针或 20G 正向斜面针获得的活检标本。AIP 按照国际共识诊断标准进行诊断。主要终点是 EUS-FNA 针的敏感性,次要终点是获得的标本量、基于淋巴浆细胞性硬化性胰腺炎(LPSP)评估的胰腺组织学和组织学发现对 AIP 诊断的贡献。
110 例患者被随机分配至 Franseen 组(22G Franseen 针)或正向斜面针组(20G 正向斜面针)。所有患者的 EUS-FNA 采样均成功。9 例因诊断为 AIP 以外的疾病而被排除。与正向斜面针相比,Fransen 针获得了更多的高倍视野。在 101 例患者中,Fransen 组 39 例(78%)和正向斜面针组 23 例(45%)被诊断为 1 级或 2 级 LPSP(P =.001)。36 例患者如果没有 EUS-FNB 标本结果,无法诊断为 1 型 AIP。
22G Franseen 针应常规用于 1 型 AIP 的组织学诊断。(临床试验注册号:UMIN 000027668.)。