Suppr超能文献

卢旺达群组产前护理与标准产前护理及其对出生时平均孕周的影响:一项整群随机对照试验方案

Group antenatal care versus standard antenatal care and effect on mean gestational age at birth in Rwanda: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Musange Sabine Furere, Butrick Elizabeth, Lundeen Tiffany, Santos Nicole, Azman Firdaus Hana, Benitez Alejandra, Nzeyimana David, Kayiramirwa Murindahabi Nathalie, Nyiraneza Lauriane, Sayinzoga Felix, Ndahindwa Vedaste, Ngabo Fidele, Condo Jeanine, Walker Dylis

机构信息

School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.

Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Gates Open Res. 2019 Sep 27;3:1548. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13053.1. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Group antenatal care has demonstrated promise as a service delivery model that may result in improved outcomes compared to standard antenatal care in socio-demographic populations at disparately high risk for poor perinatal outcomes. Intrigued by results from the United States showing lower preterm birth rates among high-risk women who participate in group antenatal care, partners working together as the Preterm Birth Initiative - Rwanda designed a trial to assess the impact of group antenatal care on gestational age at birth. This study is a pair-matched cluster randomized controlled trial with four arms. Pairs randomized to group or standard care were further matched with other pairs into quadruples, within which one pair was assigned to implement basic obstetric ultrasound at the health center and early pregnancy testing at the community. At facilities randomized to group care, this will follow the opt-out model of service delivery and individual visits will always be available for those who need or prefer them. The primary outcome of interest is mean gestational age at birth among women who presented for antenatal care before 24 completed weeks of pregnancy and attended more than one antenatal care visit. Secondary outcomes of interest include attendance at antenatal and postnatal care, preterm birth rates, satisfaction of mothers and providers, and feasibility. A convenience sample of women will be recruited to participate in a longitudinal survey in which they will report such indicators as self-reported health-related behaviors and depressive symptoms. Providers will be surveyed about satisfaction and stress. This is the largest cluster randomized controlled trial of group antenatal and postnatal care ever conducted, and the first in a low- or middle-income country to examine the effect of this model on gestational age at birth. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03154177 May 16, 2017.

摘要

与标准产前护理相比,群体产前护理作为一种服务提供模式已显示出前景,对于围产期结局不佳风险极高的社会人口群体而言,它可能会带来更好的结果。受美国研究结果的启发,即参与群体产前护理的高危女性早产率较低,卢旺达早产预防倡议组织的合作伙伴共同设计了一项试验,以评估群体产前护理对出生孕周的影响。这项研究是一项四臂配对整群随机对照试验。随机分为群体护理组或标准护理组的配对,再与其他配对进一步匹配成四组,其中一组被分配在健康中心实施基本产科超声检查,并在社区进行早孕检测。在随机分配到群体护理的机构中,将采用退出式服务提供模式,对于有需求或偏好的人,始终可以提供个人就诊服务。主要关注的结局是在妊娠满24周前接受产前护理且就诊次数超过一次的女性的平均出生孕周。其他关注的次要结局包括产前和产后护理的就诊率、早产率、母亲和提供者的满意度以及可行性。将招募一个方便样本的女性参与一项纵向调查,她们将报告自我报告的健康相关行为和抑郁症状等指标。将对提供者进行满意度和压力方面的调查。这是有史以来规模最大的群体产前和产后护理整群随机对照试验,也是低收入或中等收入国家中首个研究该模式对出生孕周影响的试验。这项研究于2017年5月16日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT03154177。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1562/6792348/efbdbcbc2ef7/gatesopenres-3-14181-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验