Li Mao-Jun, Wei Bin-Xiu, Deng Qiu-Xia, Liu Xin, Zhu Xiao-Dong, Zhang Ying
Department of Anesthesiology, Linshui County People's Hospital, Linshui 638500, Sichuan Province, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province.
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2019 Oct 25;44(10):752-6. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.180873.
To investigate the effect of preemptive electroacupuncture (EA) plus epidural block (EB) on pain reactions and stress hormone levels in primiparous parturients during labor.
A total of 104 primiparous parturients undergoing vaginal delivery were randomly divided into PA group (=31), sham EA group (=36) and EA group (=37). EA (2 Hz/100 Hz, a tolerable strength) was applied to bilateral Hegu (LI4) and Sanyinjiao (SP6) beginning from the latency of the 1 birth process when the orifice of uterus was opened to about 1 cm wider till the active stage when the orifice of the uterus opened about 3 cm wider. Patients in the sham EA group received shallow acupuncture needle stimulation (without cutaneous penetration of the needle tip, and without stimulation electric current output). All the patients of the 3 groups were given EB (1% Lidocaine, 0.05% Sufentanil and 0.1% Ropivacaine) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) when the orifice of the uterus opened about 3 cm wider. The pain severity was assessed by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at time-points of immediately after EA, 1 h after EA, 2 h after EA, immediately after EB, 1 h after EB, 2 h after EB and full open of the uterus orifice. The contents of serum adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol (COR) were assayed by using ELISA.
There was no significant difference in the VAS score at the immediate time of post-EA among the three groups (>0.05). Compared with the EB group, the VAS scores at all time-points except the immediate time of post-EA were significantly decreased in the EA group (<0.05). One and 2 h after EB, and after full open of the uterus orifice, the VAS scores in the 3 groups were all evidently decreased (<0.05), and those of the EA group were significantly lower than those of the sham EA and EB groups (<0.05). The three groups had a significant increase in the levels of serum ACTH and COR at time-points of 1 and 2 h after EA, immediately after EB, and when the orifice of the uterus was fully opened (<0.05), presenting a gradual increase of their level during the course of labor. Compared with the EB group, the levels of serum ACTH and COR contents were considerably decreased in the EA group (rather than in the sham EA group) (<0.05). The dosages of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil, the total pressing times and the effective pressing times of PCEA pump were significantly lower in the EA group than those in the EB and sham EA groups (<0.05).
EA plus epidural analgesia, given during the latency period of labor, can effectively alleviate pain, inhibit stress response and reduce the dosage of anesthetics in primiparous parturients throughout the labor process.
探讨分娩前电针(EA)联合硬膜外阻滞(EB)对初产妇分娩期疼痛反应及应激激素水平的影响。
将104例拟行阴道分娩的初产妇随机分为单纯针刺组(n = 31)、假电针组(n = 36)和电针组(n = 37)。电针组于第一产程潜伏期宫口开大约1 cm开始,至活跃期宫口开大3 cm左右,采用2 Hz/100 Hz、耐受强度的电针刺激双侧合谷(LI4)、三阴交(SP6)。假电针组给予浅针刺刺激(针尖不穿透皮肤,不输出刺激电流)。3组产妇均于宫口开大3 cm左右时给予EB(1%利多卡因、0.05%舒芬太尼、0.1%罗哌卡因)及患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)。分别于电针后即刻、电针后1 h、电针后2 h、硬膜外阻滞后即刻、硬膜外阻滞后1 h、硬膜外阻滞后2 h及宫口开全时采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度。采用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测血清促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)和皮质醇(COR)含量。
3组电针后即刻VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与单纯硬膜外阻滞组比较,电针组除电针后即刻外,其余各时间点VAS评分均显著降低(P < 0.05)。硬膜外阻滞后1 h、2 h及宫口开全时,3组VAS评分均明显降低(P < 0.05),电针组VAS评分显著低于假电针组和单纯硬膜外阻滞组(P < 0.05)。3组产妇电针后1 h、2 h、硬膜外阻滞后即刻及宫口开全时血清ACTH、COR水平均显著升高(P < 0.05),且在产程中呈逐渐上升趋势。与单纯硬膜外阻滞组比较,电针组血清ACTH、COR水平明显降低(而非假电针组,P < 0.05)。电针组罗哌卡因、舒芬太尼用量及PCEA泵总按压次数、有效按压次数均显著低于单纯硬膜外阻滞组和假电针组(P < 0.05)。
分娩潜伏期电针联合硬膜外镇痛可有效减轻初产妇分娩期疼痛,抑制应激反应,减少麻醉药物用量。