Soltan Sanjari Mostafa, Pakdel Farzad, Moosavi Fatemeh, Pirmarzdashti Niloofar, Nojomi Marzieh, Haghighi Anoosheh, Hashemi Masih, Bahmani Kashkouli Mohsen
Ophthalmology Department, Eye Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ophthalmology Department, Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019 Jul 18;14(3):299-305. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4786. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
To compare the short-term visual function results and safety of erythropoietin as an add-on to the standard corticosteroid therapy in retrobulbar optic neuritis (RON).
In this prospective pilot study, adult patients with isolated RON with less than 10 days of onset were enrolled. Patients were consecutively assigned to standard intravenous methylprednisolone treatment either in combination with intravenous erythropoietin (20,000 units/day for three days) (group-1) or intravenous methylprednisolone alone (group-2). Primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), which was assessed up to 120 days from the day the treatment was begun. Systemic evaluations were performed during and after treatment.
Sixty-two patients with RON (mean age = 26.6 5.77 years; range = 18-40 years) were enrolled into the study (group-1, = 35; group-2, = 27). BCVA three months after the treatment was 0.19 0.55 logMAR and 0.11 0.32 logMAR in group-1 and group-2, respectively (95% CI: 0.61 0.16; = 0.62). Change in BCVA after three months was 2.84 3.49 logMAR in group-1 and 2.46 1.40 logMAR in group-2 (95% CI: 0.93 1.91; = 0.57). Pace of recovery was not significantly different between the groups. No complications were detected among patients.
Intravenous erythropoietin as an add-on did not significantly improve the visual outcome in terms of visual acuity, visual field, and contrast sensitivity compared to traditional intravenous corticosteroid. This pilot study supports the safety profile of intravenous human recombinant erythropoietin, and it may help formulate future investigations with a larger sample size.
比较促红细胞生成素作为标准皮质类固醇疗法的附加治疗用于球后视神经炎(RON)的短期视觉功能结果及安全性。
在这项前瞻性试点研究中,纳入了发病少于10天的孤立性RON成年患者。患者被连续分配接受标准静脉注射甲泼尼龙治疗,其中一组(1组)联合静脉注射促红细胞生成素(20,000单位/天,共三天),另一组(2组)仅接受静脉注射甲泼尼龙。主要结局指标是最佳矫正视力(BCVA),从治疗开始之日起评估长达120天。在治疗期间和治疗后进行全身评估。
62例RON患者(平均年龄=26.6±5.77岁;范围=18 - 40岁)被纳入研究(1组,n = 35;2组,n = 27)。治疗三个月后,1组和2组的BCVA分别为0.19±0.55 logMAR和0.11±0.32 logMAR(95%CI:-0.61±0.16;P = 0.62)。三个月后BCVA的变化,1组为2.84±3.49 logMAR,2组为2.46±1.40 logMAR(95%CI:-0.93±1.91;P = 0.57)。两组之间的恢复速度无显著差异。患者中未检测到并发症。
与传统静脉注射皮质类固醇相比,附加静脉注射促红细胞生成素在视力、视野和对比敏感度方面并未显著改善视觉结局。这项试点研究支持静脉注射人重组促红细胞生成素的安全性,并且可能有助于制定未来更大样本量的研究。