Pierce Samuel R, Kornafel Tracy, Skorup Julie, Paremski Athylia C, Prosser Laura A
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dev Neurorehabil. 2020 Feb;23(2):137-139. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2019.1683910. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
: The purpose of this research was to investigate differences in Early Clinical Assessment of Balance (ECAB) scores within children with cerebral palsy (CP) with different Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels and between children with CP and typical development (TD) who are under three years of age.: The ECAB was administered to fifty children (13 with TD, 16 with GMFCS level II, 11 with GMFCS level III, 10 with GMFCS level III).: The group of children of TD had significantly higher scores than all groups of children with CP. There were significant differences in ECAB within the groups of children with CP with different GMFCS levels.: The results of this study support the construct validity of the ECAB as a measure of postural control in children under three years of age with CP.
本研究的目的是调查不同粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)水平的脑瘫(CP)儿童之间以及3岁以下CP儿童与正常发育(TD)儿童之间早期平衡临床评估(ECAB)分数的差异。对50名儿童进行了ECAB评估(13名TD儿童、16名GMFCS II级儿童、11名GMFCS III级儿童、10名GMFCS IV级儿童)。TD儿童组的分数显著高于所有CP儿童组。不同GMFCS水平的CP儿童组之间的ECAB存在显著差异。本研究结果支持ECAB作为3岁以下CP儿童姿势控制测量方法的结构效度。