Mutanga Oliver, Moen Kåre
Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Cult Health Sex. 2020 Nov;22(11):1269-1281. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1674920. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
This paper describes experiences of sexuality stigma among same-sex attracted men in Zimbabwe and analyses the consequences of such experiences for healthcare seeking. It draws on qualitative research carried out in Harare in 2017, which included in-depth interviews with sixteen gay and bisexual men, and key informant interviews with three representatives of organisations that work with gay men. There were numerous stories about sexuality stigma in the study participants´ social environments, including at home, in local communities and in healthcare facilities. We first offer a description of these and then go on to trace the implications of stigma on the relations between men who have sex with men on the one hand and the healthcare sector on the other. We conceive of stigma as a pushing force that exerts pressure on and in these relations, and identify five types of consequences of this. Stigma works to (1) produce geographical shifts in healthcare, (2) promote private over public care, (3) compartmentalise healthcare (with dedicated providers for queer persons), (4) deprofessionalise care, and (5) block access to appropriate healthcare altogether for some same-sex attracted men. Most of these consequences have negative implications for preventive or treatment-focused HIV programming.
本文描述了津巴布韦男同性恋者所经历的性取向污名,并分析了这些经历对其寻求医疗保健的影响。它借鉴了2017年在哈拉雷进行的定性研究,其中包括对16名男同性恋者和双性恋者的深入访谈,以及对与男同性恋者合作的三个组织的代表进行的关键信息人访谈。在研究参与者的社会环境中,包括在家里、当地社区和医疗保健机构,存在着大量关于性取向污名的故事。我们首先对这些情况进行描述,然后接着探讨污名对男男性行为者与医疗保健部门之间关系的影响。我们将污名视为一种推动力,它在这些关系中施加压力,并确定了这种压力的五种后果。污名会导致:(1)医疗保健出现地域转移,(2)促使人们选择私人护理而非公共护理,(3)将医疗保健进行划分(为同性恋者提供专门的医疗服务提供者),(4)使护理非专业化,以及(5)完全阻碍一些男同性恋者获得适当的医疗保健。这些后果中的大多数对以预防或治疗为重点的艾滋病毒项目都有负面影响。