Rytömaa I, Meurman J H, Koskinen J, Laakso T, Gharazi L, Turunen R
Department of Cariology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Aug;96(4):324-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01563.x.
The objective was to compare the erosive effect of some commonly used acidic drinks and milk products on a bovine tooth enamel model system. Conditions were selected to be sufficiently severe to cause erosion. Loss of material after erosion experiments was measured by recording the depth of the surface profile after repeated and prolonged exposure. Changes in the enamel surface were observed by scanning electron microscopy. The reparative mechanisms were studied by immersing test teeth in saliva, with or without (2 ppm) fluoride, after severe demineralization in the test products. According to the t-test for paired means, cola beverages and orange beverages differed from beer, coffee with or without sugar, strawberry yoghurt, buttermilk, and carbonated mineral water at the level P less than 0.01. Each of the last-mentioned test products differed from sports drinks, diet cola beverages and orange juice less significantly. In addition, bathing of teeth in saliva between exposures to the test products did not influence the erosive depth. The results, based on in vitro conditions that ensured erosion, are useful for comparative purposes but cannot be directly extended to the oral cavity under normal use conditions.
目的是比较一些常用酸性饮料和奶制品对牛牙釉质模型系统的侵蚀作用。选择的条件足够严苛以导致侵蚀。通过记录反复长时间暴露后表面轮廓的深度来测量侵蚀实验后材料的损失。通过扫描电子显微镜观察牙釉质表面的变化。在测试产品中进行严重脱矿后,将测试牙齿浸泡在含或不含(2 ppm)氟化物的唾液中,研究修复机制。根据配对均值的t检验,可乐饮料和橙汁饮料与啤酒、加糖或不加糖的咖啡、草莓酸奶、酪乳和碳酸矿泉水在P值小于0.01的水平上存在差异。最后提到的每种测试产品与运动饮料、低糖可乐饮料和橙汁的差异较小。此外,在接触测试产品之间将牙齿浸泡在唾液中不会影响侵蚀深度。基于确保侵蚀的体外条件得出的结果可用于比较目的,但不能直接推广到正常使用条件下的口腔情况。