School of Environmental Science and Engineering and Key Laboratory of Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Technology and Management of Shenzhen City, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, PR China.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering and Key Laboratory of Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Technology and Management of Shenzhen City, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China.
Environ Pollut. 2020 Feb;257:113353. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113353. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
Environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) are receiving increasing concern due to their toxicity and ubiquity in the environment. To avoid restrictions imposed when using a high-volume active sampler, this study uses tree leaves to act as passive samplers to investigate the spatial distribution characteristics and sources of airborne EPFRs. Tree leaf samples were collected from 120 sites in five areas around China (each approximately 4 km × 4 km). EPFR concentrations in particles (<2 μm) on the surface of 110 leaf samples were detected, ranging from 7.5 × 10 to 4.5 × 10 spins/g. For the 10 N.D. samples, they were all collected from areas inaccessible by vehicles. The g-values of EPFRs on 68% leaf samples were larger than 2.004, suggesting the electron localized on the oxygen atom, and they were consistent with the road dust sample (g-value: 2.0042). Significant positive correlation was found between concentrations of elemental carbon (tracer of vehicle emissions) and EPFRs. Spatial distribution mapping showed that EPFR levels in various land uses differed noticeably. Although previous work has linked atmospheric EPFRs to waste incineration, the evidence in this study suggests that vehicle emissions, especially from heavy-duty vehicles, are the main sources. While waste incinerators with low emissions or effective dust-control devices might not be an important EPFR contributor. According to our estimation, over 90% of the EPFRs deposited on tree leaves might be attributed to automotive exhaust emissions, as a synergistic effect of primary exhausts and degradation of aromatic compounds in road dust. With adding the trapping agent into the particle samples (<2 μm), signals of hydroxyl radicals were observed. This indicates that EPFRs collected from this phytosampling method can lead to the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) once they are inhaled by human beings. Thus, this study helps highlight EPFR "hotspots" for potential health risk identification.
环境持久性自由基(EPFRs)由于其在环境中的毒性和普遍性而受到越来越多的关注。为了避免使用大容量主动采样器时受到限制,本研究使用树叶作为被动采样器来研究空气中 EPFRs 的空间分布特征和来源。从中国五个地区的 120 个地点采集了树叶样本(每个地区约 4km×4km)。检测了 110 个树叶样本表面颗粒物(<2μm)中 EPFR 的浓度,范围为 7.5×10 到 4.5×10 自旋/g。对于 10 个 N.D. 样本,它们都是从车辆无法到达的区域采集的。68%树叶样本的 EPFRs 的 g 值大于 2.004,表明电子定域在氧原子上,与道路灰尘样本(g 值:2.0042)一致。发现元素碳(车辆排放的示踪剂)浓度与 EPFRs 之间存在显著正相关。空间分布图显示,不同土地利用类型的 EPFR 水平差异明显。尽管以前的工作将大气 EPFRs 与垃圾焚烧联系起来,但本研究的证据表明,车辆排放,特别是重型车辆的排放,是主要来源。而排放低或有效控制粉尘的垃圾焚烧炉可能不是 EPFR 的重要来源。根据我们的估计,树叶上沉积的 EPFRs 中超过 90%可能归因于汽车尾气排放,这是一次排放物和道路灰尘中芳香族化合物降解的协同作用。在将捕集剂加入到颗粒样品(<2μm)中时,观察到羟基自由基的信号。这表明,通过这种植物采样方法收集的 EPFRs 一旦被人类吸入,可能会释放出活性氧物质(ROS)。因此,本研究有助于突出 EPFR 的“热点”,以识别潜在的健康风险。