• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同创造服务以维持独立性和优化福祉:来自澳大利亚独居老年妇女(OWLA)项目的经验教训。

Co-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: Learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project.

机构信息

Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Bentleigh, Vic., Australia.

Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):494-504. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12882. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.12882
PMID:31663214
Abstract

For many populations at risk of social isolation, including Older Women Living Alone (OWLA), existing services to maintain independence and optimise well-being are difficult to access, unsuitable or unavailable. Co-creation is a strategy to develop 'person-centred' services that meet the needs of individuals. We adapted an existing framework for co-creation and used participatory action research methods, supported by an evidence base comprising a systematic review, analysis of routinely collected data and interviews, to develop person-centred services for OWLA. This approach achieved co-creation through an iterative process of consultation and review, involving a series of facilitated discussions with women living alone and stakeholders. A total of 13 women living alone, aged ≥55 years, and 11 stakeholders representing service providers and advocacy groups, were recruited to participate in these discussions. Sessions with between three and five OWLA, were held across Melbourne. The information was compiled and presented to service stakeholders in a single facilitated forum, held in central Melbourne. Smaller facilitated sessions with OWLA followed, to review and discuss the collated service stakeholder input. The information from these OWLA sessions were again compiled and directed back to the service stakeholders for consideration and further discussion. The two groups came together for a final forum to prioritise the co-created ten services that they believed would be feasible and would address unmet need to support OWLA maintain independence. The process of co-creation was time-consuming and required considerable preparation to facilitate input from the target population. Small groups, gathering at convenient local locations, with transport support were essential in removing barriers to participation. However, co-creation was a viable method of eliciting the women's preferences and developing services more likely to meet their needs.

摘要

对于许多面临社交孤立风险的人群,包括独居老年女性(OWLA),现有的维持独立性和优化幸福感的服务难以获得、不适合或不可用。共同创造是一种制定“以个人为中心”服务的策略,以满足个人的需求。我们采用了现有的共同创造框架,并使用参与式行动研究方法,辅以系统评价、常规收集数据分析和访谈的证据基础,为 OWLA 开发了以个人为中心的服务。这种方法通过咨询和审查的迭代过程实现了共同创造,涉及与独居女性和利益相关者进行一系列的促进讨论。共有 13 名年龄在 55 岁及以上的独居女性和 11 名代表服务提供者和倡导团体的利益相关者被招募来参与这些讨论。在墨尔本各地举行了三到五名 OWLA 之间的会议。将信息汇总并在墨尔本中心的单一促进论坛上呈现给服务利益相关者。随后与 OWLA 进行了较小的促进会议,以审查和讨论汇总的服务利益相关者意见。再次将这些 OWLA 会议的信息汇总并直接反馈给服务利益相关者,供他们考虑和进一步讨论。这两个群体齐聚一堂,举行了最后一次论坛,确定他们认为可行且将解决支持 OWLA 保持独立性的未满足需求的十大共同创造服务。共同创造的过程既耗时又需要大量的准备工作,以促进目标人群的投入。小团体聚集在方便的当地地点,并提供交通支持,这对于消除参与障碍至关重要。然而,共同创造是一种可行的方法,可以引出女性的偏好并开发更有可能满足她们需求的服务。

相似文献

1
Co-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: Learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project.共同创造服务以维持独立性和优化福祉:来自澳大利亚独居老年妇女(OWLA)项目的经验教训。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):494-504. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12882. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Using co-creation and multi-criteria decision analysis to close service gaps for underserved populations.运用共同创造和多准则决策分析来弥合服务不足人群的服务差距。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1058-1068. doi: 10.1111/hex.12923. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Development of a clinical pharmacy model within an Australian home nursing service using co-creation and participatory action research: the siting harmacist (ViP) study.在澳大利亚家庭护理服务中使用共同创造和参与式行动研究开发临床药学模式:选址药剂师(ViP)研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e018722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018722.
4
Improving community support for older people's needs through commissioning third sector services: a qualitative study.通过委托第三部门服务来改善社区对老年人需求的支持:一项定性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Apr;24(2):116-123. doi: 10.1177/1355819619829774.
5
Challenges to the provision of community aged care services across rural Australia: perceptions of service managers.澳大利亚农村地区社区老年护理服务提供面临的挑战:服务管理者的看法。
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):4059. doi: 10.22605/RRH4059. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Healthy ageing in a deprived northern UK city: A co-creation study.英国北部贫困城市的健康老龄化:一项共同创造研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):2233-2242. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13036. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Development of a model of dementia support and pathway for culturally and linguistically diverse communities using co-creation and participatory action research.利用共同创造和参与式行动研究,为文化和语言多元社区开发痴呆症支持模式及路径。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 7;6(12):e013064. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013064.
8
Promoting gender responsive support for women inmates: a case study from inside a prison.促进对女性囚犯的性别敏感支持:来自一所监狱内部的案例研究
Int J Prison Health. 2019 Jun 10;15(2):126-137. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-03-2018-0011. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Involving the public and other stakeholders in development and evaluation of a community pharmacy alcohol screening and brief advice service.让公众和其他利益相关者参与到社区药店酒精筛查和简短咨询服务的开发和评估中。
Public Health. 2014 Apr;128(4):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.11.001. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
10
Effectiveness of a voluntary family befriending service: a mixed methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.一项自愿家庭帮扶服务的效果评估:基于 Donabedian 模型的混合方法研究
Public Health. 2018 Jul;160:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of Living Alone in South Korea Compared to Other Countries: A Public Health Perspective and YouTube Topic Modeling Analysis.韩国与其他国家独居模式对比:公共卫生视角与YouTube主题建模分析
Int J Public Health. 2025 Aug 29;70:1608509. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608509. eCollection 2025.
2
A Participatory Model for Cocreating Accessible Rehabilitation Technology for Stroke Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach.一种为中风幸存者共同创造无障碍康复技术的参与式模型:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Aug 23;11:e57227. doi: 10.2196/57227.
3
"": protocol for the evaluation of a codesigned whole of community approach to promote social connection in older adults.
“”:评估一种共同设计的全社区方法以促进老年人社会联系的方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 23;12:1342562. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1342562. eCollection 2024.
4
Co-creation of self-management support during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.住院脑卒中康复期间自我管理支持的共同创造
PEC Innov. 2023 Jul 10;3:100191. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100191. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
5
Volunteer peer support frameworks supporting older women living alone.支持独居老年女性的志愿者同伴支持框架。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4252-e4263. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13818. Epub 2022 May 6.
6
Using co-creation and multi-criteria decision analysis to close service gaps for underserved populations.运用共同创造和多准则决策分析来弥合服务不足人群的服务差距。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1058-1068. doi: 10.1111/hex.12923. Epub 2019 Jun 11.