Suppr超能文献

患者报告结局测量在肩部文献中的使用趋势。

Usage Trends of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Shoulder Literature.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL (Dr. Mosher, Dr. Ewing, Ms. Collins, Dr. Brabston, Dr. Momaya, and Dr. Ponce), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN (Dr. Mosher), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO (Dr. Ewing), the University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL (Mr. Young), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (Dr. Tashjian).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep 1;28(17):e774-e781. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00455.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Quantifying patient outcomes is integral in orthopaedic practice, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assist with this goal and assist clinicians in assessing subjective outcomes (pain, satisfaction, etc.). This study seeks to identify the most highly used PROMs in the shoulder literature and analyze their usage trends.

METHODS

PubMed was queried for all shoulder-based articles published in eight selected journals from 2007 to 2017. Articles were assessed for PROM usage, surgical approach, surgical procedure, and disease pathology. Frequency analyses identified the most used PROMs overall, and for each approach, procedure, and pathology. Last, usage trends, question number, validation, and clinician dependence of PROMs with ≥20 uses were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,740 of 2,462 articles (71%) used 105 unique PROMs 4,394 times during the study. PROM usage increased 18%, and the use of multiple PROMs increased by 20%. PROMs with a clinician component increased 21% slower than the baseline. Twenty-two PROMs (17%) had >20 uses, with the most used PROMs being the Constant-Murley Score (783), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (731), Visual Analog Scale (685), Simple Shoulder Test (372), and the University of California, Los Angeles, Shoulder Rating Scale (274). PROMs demonstrating the greatest usage increase were the EuroQol 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (1,282%), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (638%), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (632%), Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (582%), and Oxford Shoulder Score (462%)-all without a clinician component.

DISCUSSION

PROM usage is increasing, often with multiple PROMs being used to evaluate patient outcomes. PROMs without a clinician component are growing at higher rates than their clinician-dependent counterparts, highlighting an emphasis on patient reporting of outcomes. This study suggests that the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Visual Analog Scales-all without a mandatory clinician component and high levels of use-will be the most highly used PROMs moving forward to assess shoulder function.

摘要

简介

在矫形外科实践中,量化患者的治疗效果是至关重要的,而患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)有助于实现这一目标,并帮助临床医生评估主观治疗效果(疼痛、满意度等)。本研究旨在确定在肩部文献中使用最广泛的 PROMs,并分析其使用趋势。

方法

在 2007 年至 2017 年期间,从 8 种选定的期刊中检索了所有基于肩部的文章,并在 PubMed 上进行了查询。评估了文章中 PROM 使用情况、手术方法、手术程序和疾病病理。通过频率分析确定了总体上使用最多的 PROMs,以及每种方法、程序和病理的 PROMs。最后,对使用频率≥20 次的 PROMs 进行了使用趋势、问题数量、验证和临床医生依赖性的分析。

结果

在研究期间,共有 1740 篇(71%)文章中使用了 4394 次 105 种不同的 PROM。PROM 的使用量增加了 18%,而同时使用多种 PROM 的数量增加了 20%。包含临床医生组成部分的 PROM 增加速度比基线慢 21%。有 22 种 PROM(17%)的使用频率超过 20 次,使用最多的 PROM 是 Constant-Murley 评分(783)、美国肩肘外科医生肩评分(731)、视觉模拟评分(685)、简单肩测试(372)和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校肩评分(274)。使用量增长最大的 PROM 是欧洲五维健康量表(1282%)、肩痛和残疾指数(638%)、安大略西部肩袖指数(632%)、安大略西部骨关节炎肩指数(582%)和牛津肩评分(462%)-均无临床医生组成部分。

讨论

PROM 的使用量正在增加,通常使用多种 PROM 来评估患者的治疗效果。不包含临床医生组成部分的 PROM 比包含临床医生组成部分的 PROM 增长速度更快,这突出了对患者报告结果的重视。本研究表明,美国肩肘外科医生肩评分、牛津肩评分、视觉模拟评分-均无临床医生组成部分且使用频率较高-将成为未来评估肩部功能的最常用的 PROMs。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验