• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国外科医师学会国家质量改进计划未能完全捕捉到基于植入物的乳房重建并发症。

The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program Incompletely Captures Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Complications.

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery.

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;84(3):271-275. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002051.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002051
PMID:31663932
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) accounts for 70% of postmastectomy reconstructions in the United States. Improving the quality of surgical care in IBR patients through accurate measurements of outcomes is necessary. The purpose of this study is to compare the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data from our institution to our complete institutional health records database.

METHODS

Data were collected and recorded for all patients undergoing IBR at our institution from 2015 to 2017. The data were completely identified and compared with our institutional NSQIP database for demographics and complications.

RESULTS

The electronic health records data search identified 768 IBR patients in 3 years and NSQIP reported on 229 (30%) patients. Demographics were reported similarly among the 2 databases. Rates of tissue expander/implant infections (5.9% vs 1.8%; P = 0.003) and wound dehiscence (3.5% vs 0.4%; P = 0.003) were not reported similarly between our database and NSQIP. However, the rates of hematoma (2.7% vs 1.8%) and skin flap necrosis (2.5% vs 1.8%) were comparable between the two databases. In our database, 43% of all complications presented after 30 days of surgery, beyond NSQIP's capture period.

CONCLUSIONS

Databases built on partial sampling, such as the NSQIP, may be useful for demographic analyses, but fall short of providing data for complications after IBR, such as infections and wound dehiscence. These results highlight the utility and importance of complete databases. National comparisons of clinical outcomes for IBR should be interpreted with caution when using partial databases.

摘要

背景

在美国,植入物乳房重建(IBR)占乳房切除术后重建的 70%。通过准确测量结果来提高 IBR 患者的手术护理质量是必要的。本研究的目的是将我们机构的美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据与我们完整的机构健康记录数据库进行比较。

方法

从 2015 年至 2017 年,我们机构对所有接受 IBR 的患者收集并记录数据。这些数据与我们机构的 NSQIP 数据库完全匹配,以比较患者的人口统计学和并发症。

结果

电子健康记录数据搜索在 3 年内确定了 768 例 IBR 患者,而 NSQIP 报告了 229 例(30%)患者。这两个数据库报告的人口统计学数据相似。组织扩张器/植入物感染(5.9%比 1.8%;P=0.003)和伤口裂开(3.5%比 0.4%;P=0.003)的发生率在我们的数据库和 NSQIP 之间没有相似之处。然而,血肿(2.7%比 1.8%)和皮瓣坏死(2.5%比 1.8%)的发生率在这两个数据库中是可比的。在我们的数据库中,所有并发症中有 43%发生在手术后 30 天之后,超出了 NSQIP 的捕获期。

结论

基于部分抽样的数据库,如 NSQIP,可能对人口统计学分析有用,但在 IBR 后的感染和伤口裂开等并发症方面的数据不足。这些结果突出了完整数据库的实用性和重要性。在使用部分数据库对 IBR 的临床结果进行国家比较时应谨慎解读。

相似文献

1
The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program Incompletely Captures Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Complications.美国外科医师学会国家质量改进计划未能完全捕捉到基于植入物的乳房重建并发症。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;84(3):271-275. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002051.
2
Lessons learned from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: has centralized data collection improved immediate breast reconstruction outcomes and safety?从美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中吸取的教训:集中数据收集是否改善了即刻乳房重建的结果和安全性?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):859-868. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000615.
3
Does timing of alloplastic breast reconstruction in older women impact immediate postoperative complications? An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.老年女性行假体乳房再造的时机是否会影响术后即刻并发症?美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)数据库分析。
Breast. 2019 Dec;48:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
4
Racial and age disparities persist in immediate breast reconstruction: an updated analysis of 48,564 patients from the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data sets.即刻乳房重建中种族和年龄差异依然存在:对2005年至2011年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据集的48,564例患者的最新分析。
Am J Surg. 2016 Jul;212(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
National trends and complication rates after bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2012.2005年至2012年双侧乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建术后的全国趋势和并发症发生率
Am J Surg. 2015 Sep;210(3):512-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 May 14.
6
Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.乳腺癌根治术后自体乳房重建的选择:基于美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划的结果比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
7
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes.乳房切除术后乳房重建:十年趋势及术后即刻结果分析
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.023. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
8
Is immediate breast reconstruction safe in women over 70? An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.70 岁以上女性行即刻乳房重建术安全吗?国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Aug;177(1):215-224. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05273-1. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
9
A 30-day risk assessment of mastectomy alone compared to immediate breast reconstruction (IBR).单纯乳房切除术与即刻乳房重建(IBR)的30天风险评估。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Jun;48(3):209-15. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.865633. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
10
A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Immediate, Delayed Immediate, and Delayed Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of 2010-2020 NSQIP Data.即时、延迟即时与延迟自体游离皮瓣乳房重建术后结局比较:2010-2020 年 NSQIP 数据分析。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 Oct;39(8):664-670. doi: 10.1055/a-2056-0909. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index in Predicting Surgical-Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Breast Implant Augmentation: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Based 5-Year Study.改良5项衰弱指数在预测接受隆胸手术患者手术部位感染中的效能:一项基于国家外科质量改进项目的5年研究。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Jul 18;5:ojad067. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad067. eCollection 2023.
2
Early Expander-to-Implant Exchange after Postmastectomy Reconstruction Reduces Rates of Subsequent Major Infectious Complications.乳房切除术后重建中早期扩张器至植入物置换可降低后续严重感染并发症的发生率。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Dec 18;8(12):e3275. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003275. eCollection 2020 Dec.